From the moment I published Liar's Poker about my experience working for Salomon Brothers, I began to receive letters from people who wanted to know how they, too, might pen a searing expose of their Wall Street firms.
For years these requests came to me at a rate of about one a month, but lately I've been getting several each week. Old Enronians, former dot-commies, newly laid-off Wall Street brokers: America is suddenly pulsing with idle people who can spell.
Those who write sometimes ask if I can set them up with an agent or a publisher, or perhaps write up their experiences for them (generously offering to split what they always assume will be a huge take). But mainly what they want is advice. Do I, they wonder, have any tips? I do.
If, when you sit down to write your book about your former employer, you are thinking, "I'll show the bastards," you can be fairly certain you will not.
There is a general rule about literary motives: They needn't be admirable; they must merely be disguised. The desire for more attention than one deserves, for instance, is an unattractive quality in a human being but useful in a writer, and easily masked as something else.
Indignation at some personal slight, while not always a bad quality in a human being, is a terrible quality in a writer of a personal story, precisely because it is so difficult to hide.
About half the people I hear from were fired or feel betrayed by their bosses. Wall Street people are especially prone to these hot feelings. They never quite believed it when people told them that, if they wanted a friend on Wall Street, they should buy a dog.
Feelings of betrayal abound in a free market economy, but they are not terribly useful to a person who seeks to describe that economy.
They lead, inevitably, to self-pity, which you can be sure the reader will not indulge. The reader is not interested in you; all he cares about is your story. If you ask the reader to be upset on your behalf that you were fired, the reader will only wonder what you did to deserve it.
When one's subject is oneself, moral indignation is unhelpful.
If you have been struck suddenly by your moral superiority over the people you once worked for, you should think twice before you set out to prove it to the rest of the world. The reader will be curious to know where those fine feelings of moral repugnance were when you took the job.
A corollary to this rule, useful especially to refugees from Enron Corp: If it didn't occur to you that your company was corrupt until you read about it in the newspaper, describing that corruption to others may not be your life's calling.
"Zany" and "colorful" don't mean "interesting for people who don't know me to read about." The belief that foolish excess equals literary value was common in Wall Street dropouts at the end of the 1980s and is common again in Silicon Valley dropouts today.
But zaniness alone won't hold a story together. At best it might serve as an interesting aside. Indeed, your excessive interest in zany business anecdotes is itself zany and, like a pierced nose, a sure sign that you don't have anything deeply interesting to say.
Conversely, you should feel emboldened if you doubt how "colorful" to others your life story is. In the past couple of months I've heard from a great many Enron employees. On purely literary terms, one stands far above the rest: In clear, thoughtful, unsensational letters, he has brought his experience of working at the bankrupt energy trader to life for me. And yet, even as he writes, he insists he has no ability to tell his story to the wider public. Which is why he does.
If you don't want to actually write your book yourself -- if you're just hoping to be paid for dealing some inside dope -- it's unlikely what you have to say, or think you have to say, will make for an enjoyable reading experience.
Oddly enough, many of the Old Enronians who hope to tell their story are in exactly this position. They simply want money for what they saw and heard, and perhaps a bit of literary celebrity to go along with it. It doesn't occur to them that the primacy of their economic motives is what got them -- or, at any rate, their evil former employers -- into trouble in the first place.
5) If, before you write a word of your story, you are writing to people for advice about how to get started, forget about it.
It's time to find another real job.
Michael Lewis, whose books include Next: The Future Just Happened and Liar's Poker, is a columnist for Bloomberg News. The opinions expressed are his own.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source