I assume I'm not the only one who feels a tiny shudder of delight whenever I open the newspaper and find another story about Jack Welch's sex scandal.
A few months ago, the 66-year-old former chairman of General Electric Co agreed to give an interview to 42-year-old Suzy Wetlaufer, the editor of the Harvard Business Review, and then wound up giving her more than that.
A few weeks later, Wetlaufer received a phone call from Mrs. Jack Welch who, in asking Wetlaufer how she could claim to be an objective journalist while sleeping with her subject, issued what amounted to a thinly veiled threat to expose the affair.
Spooked, Wetlaufer went to her superiors and exposed herself.
Rather than kill their Welch interview, the HBR sent a pair of reporters to reinterview Welch, and the unsurprisingly toadying Q&A duly appeared last month.
Meanwhile, HBR's rank and file got wind of Wetlaufer's conduct and became enraged. They called for her head, and nearly got it. But then Jack Welch interceded on her behalf -- or at any rate made a few calls to Boston lawyers and Harvard bigwigs. In the end, Wetlaufer lost her title as editor, but kept her office and her salary. There the matter rests, at least for the moment.
Serious people disagree on the meaning of these strange events. Some view it as an excuse to reopen the hoary question of how close a journalist should permit herself (or himself) to get to the subject of a story. Others argue that Jack Welch's sex life is not the slightest bit interesting, and we should all be focusing on the way the Harvard Business Review routinely allows corporate big shots like Welch to manipulate its copy.
But the Harvard Business Review has never pretended to be anything other than what it is -- a mechanism for making business sound really, really complicated, and for making business people feel as if they are deep thinkers. And in any case, so many business journalists have figuratively crawled into bed with Jack Welch for so many years it seems less a shock than a satire that one intrepid woman did it literally.
Anyway, I find it hard to become worked up by the journalistic-ethics angle of the story. What's interesting to me is how thoroughly Jack Welch has been trussed up by his wife.
Jane Welch, his second wife, waited until her husband stepped into the noose she had laid on the ground, then yanked the rope and sent the poor man flying skyward. Welch may be one of the shrewdest, most self-interested men ever to enter a corporate boardroom, but he met his match in the woman he married.
Note first that Jane Welch precipitated the entire scandal.
Without her phone call to Wetlaufer, none of us would have known that Jack Welch had sex. Note also how, after making her phone call, Mrs. Welch stepped away and let the media do her dirty work.
In her 13 years of marriage to the chief of the world's most valuable company, Jane Welch obviously learned a great deal about managing the press. She knew better than to publicize her husband's infidelity herself. Doing so would cast her as just another interested party and, besides, it was unnecessary. All that was needed was to recast her husband's dalliance with Wetlaufer as a matter of journalistic ethics, and journalists would find ways to make it play and play.
I think I know exactly when Jack Welch remembered why he married Mrs. Welch in the first place: when she demanded her divorce. If Mrs. Welch, a former attorney, was so shocked and hurt by her husband's infidelity, she might have acted when she discovered it.
But she waited at least several months, until the scandal hit full steam in the press, before she notified her husband that she wanted not only her freedom but half his money, which came to roughly half a billion dollars. At this point, the sort of people who might have publicly risen to defend her husband -- and smear her -- could only sound ridiculous.
A fancy divorce lawyer named Raoul Felder, for instance, was quoted as saying Mr. Welch should fight the divorce. "She might not have the grounds for divorce," Felder told the New York Daily News. "[What] I've read in the media suggests he had nothing more than a close friendship." Meanwhile, over in USA Today, Wetlaufer's spokeswoman said the affair with Jack Welch was "ongoing." The question now isn't whether Mrs. Welch will clobber Mr. Welch but how thorough her triumph will be. Obviously she is a pro and knows what she's doing, but it is only now that she faces her sternest media test.
She understands that the less she is herself in the media, the more she will be cast by journalists as the wronged woman. But she must also realize that the longer and louder the story plays in the media, the more money she can extract from her embarrassed husband. And without a few quotes and perhaps a photo from the aggrieved wife, the story may soon die.
Enter Lorna Wendt. You may recall Wendt as the woman who was spurned by Gary Wendt, former chief executive of General Electric Capital Corp. You may also recall that Lorna Wendt made a principled stand on behalf of corporate wives everywhere, and successfully sued her feckless husband for half his net worth, and thus landed on the covers of business magazines everywhere.
And if you don't recall any of this, she'll help you. Thus opens Wendt's March 14 press release: "The recent news flurry on a potential divorce for former CEO Jack Welch and his wife Jane may raise memories of another high-profile split involving a GE executive." And off it goes to introduce our nation's journalists to something called the Institute for Equality in Marriage.
An institute it may be, but it also is a machine for keeping Jack Welch's feet over the fire. A nod from Mrs. Jack Welch and Mr. Jack Welch will be back in the frying pan, as an excuse for the media to rehash the pressing issue of how much wives who catch their corporate husbands cheating should be paid.
It's often pointed out just how gifted our corporate leaders have become at looking out for their own financial interests.
Should they expect any less from their wives?
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source