Lutz Erbring is a social scientist, so naturally your first assumption -- - nothing personal against him, of course -- is that he's full of baloney. But not so fast.
Erbring is a professor of mass communications studies at the University of Berlin. He also works at the Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, or SIQSS -- an acronym only social scientists can pronounce.
With two Stanford colleagues, Erbring has just written a paper with the less-than-red-hot title "Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations and Sociability." It deserves a rousing round of huzzahs, although it probably won't get one when it's published later this year in the book The Internet in Everyday Life. Erbring and his colleagues are what you might call Internet skeptics. This puts them at odds with much of the intellectual world, where the dominant view of the Internet and its social effects is aggressively Utopian.
Even the collapse of the technology boom and the deeply satisfying implosion of such firms as Flooze.com and Boo.com has failed to dampen the ardor of the enthusiasts, who continue to herald a blissful future of virtual communities, frictionless commerce and personal freedom unconstrained by time or space.
Some of the cheerleading almost makes sense, as Erbring and his co-authors acknowledge. Nobody will deny the benefits the Internet has brought to business.
The enthusiasts, who include many of Erbring's fellow social scientists, go further. The Internet, the boosters say, brings similar benefits to noncommercial life as well -- creating new, improved forms of human community and enriching civic life, even as it alters some of its traditional arrangements.
"Sorry," Erbring said in an interview last week. "We don't buy the hype." To get a handle on how Internet use affects the way people relate to one another, Erbring and his colleagues fielded a random sample of 6,000 computer users to fill out detailed time diaries.
The sprawling pile of numbers that resulted was then teased and tortured according to the excruciatingly precise, not to say boring, methodology of social science.
And the conclusions are precise, too.
"For each minute spent on the Internet during the last 24 hours, there is a reduction of approximately one-third of a minute spent with family members," Erbring and his colleagues write.
According to overall usage rates, this means that the average American spends about one hour less a week with his or her family than he or she would otherwise, thanks to the Internet. It has similar, though less drastic, effects on the time people spend kibitzing with colleagues at work. And that time you used to spend chatting with family and friends is now spent alone, staring into the glow of a computer monitor.
"Time online is largely an asocial activity that competes with, rather than complements, face-to-face social time," Erbring and his colleagues write.
Now, this might not seem like shocking news to you, but it should be a revelation to the Utopians. Some of the more Internet-happy social scientists have declared that Internet use has no negative effects on family time or face-to-face contact. But the studies on which they based their conclusions were smaller and much less detailed than Erbring's.
Other enthusiasts will concede the point that the Internet draws people away from each other. But it compensates, they argue, by creating new forms of social contact -- e-mail, for example, and those virtual communities extolled so lavishly in magazines like Wired.
"E-mail is wonderful for business purposes," Erbring says. "But you're talking to a keyboard, not a person. It's no substitute for a real letter, and certainly not for real social interaction, where you're arguing, drinking, laughing with another person."
And those marvelous virtual communities? "The Internet offers an additional way of finding people who share your interests," Erbring told me. "But is that really a community? It doesn't bring people into real contact. `Community' is a loaded term people use to make certain features of the Internet seem more positive."
Talking to Erbring reminded me of the Bowling Alone controversy launched a few years ago by Harvard's Robert Putnam in an article and then a book by that name. Putnam lamented the post-1960s decline in civic associations like bowling leagues -- all the informal social arrangements that bind people together into a genuine, as opposed to virtual, community.
The retreat from this kind of social life had atomized America, Putnam said, and endangered the possibility of sustaining a common culture.
Putnam largely blamed television for this unhappy development. But if Erbring and his colleagues are right, we may soon see the TV era as a golden age of sociability, compared to what the Internet is doing to us.
"People watch TV, they chat, they eat together while it's on," Erbring says. "You can place it in the background while you interact with your friends or family."
But when you're on the Internet, it's just you, the Web and Matt Drudge on the other end. The future looks dark indeed.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source