Home / Business Focus
Tue, Oct 16, 2001 - Page 19 News List

GE's earnings rise 3 percent over last year

The US' largest company by share value was hit by insurance losses but Wall Street is still gung ho about prospects

By Claudia H. Deutsch  /  NYTIMES NEWS SERVICE , NEW YORK

General Electric's new chief executive, Jeffrey Immelt at his Manhattan office in the Rockefeller Center.

PHOTO: NY TIMES

General Electric Co said Thursday that its third quarter earnings rose 3 percent over the same period last year, despite huge insurance losses related to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Without those losses, which carved US$0.04 a share off earnings, the increase would have been 16 percent. GE also vowed to generate double-digit earnings growth this year and next.

Investors were pleased with the results and with GE's announcement that its NBC unit would buy Telemundo Communications Group. GE shares rose US$1.04, to US$38.95.

"In this environment, no one would have thought it horrible if GE stepped away from its promises of double-digit earnings growth," said Jeanne Terrile of Merrill Lynch. Other analysts noted that GE had effectively used layoffs and Internet technologies to bring costs down. "The whole company is well ahead on the cost curve," said Michael T. Regan, an analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston.

Still, Jeffrey Immelt, GE's chairman since Sept. 7, faces huge challenges. The terrorist attacks have increased NBC's costs for news coverage, even as the network ran many commercial-free hours. The attacks will result in at least US$400 million in insurance payouts. They will weaken sales of aircraft engines, already hurt by an airline industry slowdown. In addition, they have probably accelerated and deepened a broad economic downturn that was already hurting GE's economically sensitive businesses.

GE earned US$3.28 billion, or US$0.33 a share, in the quarter, up from US$3.18 billion, or US$0.32 a share, in the same quarter last year. But GE's revenues for the quarter were US$29.4 billion, down 8 percent from last year's US$32 billion.

The comparison is a bit skewed -- GE still owned Montgomery Ward in last year's third quarter, and NBC was reaping huge revenues from the Olympics -- but analysts warn that the prospect of slower growth is real.

"If GE is to keep posting double-digit earnings growth, it will have to match reductions in costs to reductions in revenues," warned Robert Friedman of S&P Equity Research, one of the few analysts who says he thinks GE stock is overpriced.

Some GE businesses -- G Medical Systems, Immelt's alma mater, is a notable example -- continue to predict heady growth. But G Aircraft Engines will probably see a big downturn in orders soon. And, as global power generating capacity catches up to demand, GE Power Systems is unlikely to maintain the nearly 40 percent annual growth it has shown in the last two years.

Immelt is also battling the Environmental Protection Agency, which has ordered GE to spend US$500 million to dredge the Hudson River of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCB's, that GE legally released into the river decades ago.

Immelt discussed the subject in an interview last month and, through a spokesman, said his views remained unchanged.

"This isn't about spending US$500 million on some magic bullet," Immelt said, noting that GE has already spent US$200 million on removing the PCBs. "I'm in the business of gathering facts and acting on them, and dredging remains a debatable technical solution."

Many analysts noted that GE's materials business was weaker than they had expected this quarter. And several suggested that GE would be better off without its lighting and appliance units. "Such businesses give them a good presence with the consumer, but they don't really fit in with GE's services-oriented, high technology business model," said James P. Ruskin, an analyst at the Dreyfus Corp, whose portfolios include GE stock.

This story has been viewed 2248 times.
TOP top