Criminals exploiting Wi-Fi networks to cover their tracks

Sophisticated cyber-criminals can make their crimes untraceable by usurping unsuspecting users' wireless networks

By Seth Schiesel  /  NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE , New York

Sun, Mar 20, 2005 - Page 12

The spread of the wireless data technology known as Wi-Fi has reshaped the way millions of people go online, letting them tap into high-speed Internet connections effortlessly at home and in many public places.

But every convenience has its cost. US federal and state law enforcement officials say sophisticated criminals have begun to use the unsecured Wi-Fi networks of unsuspecting consumers and businesses to help cover their tracks in cyberspace.

In the wired world, it was often difficult for lawbreakers to make themselves untraceable on the Internet. In the wireless world, with scores of open Wi-Fi networks in some neighborhoods, it could hardly be easier.

Law enforcement officials warn that such connections are being commandeered for child pornography, fraud, death threats and identity and credit card theft.

"We have known for a long time that the criminal use of the Internet was progressing at a greater rate than law enforcement had the knowledge or ability to catch up," said Jan Gilhooly, who retired last month as the special agent in charge of the Secret Service field office in Newark, New Jersey, and now helps coordinate the state's operations for the Department of Homeland Security.

"Now it's the same with the wireless technologies," Gilhooly said.

In 2003 the Secret Service office in Newark began an international investigation called Operation Firewall that infiltrated the Web sites and computer networks of suspected professional data thieves. Since last October, more than 30 people around the world have been arrested in connection with the operation and accused of trafficking in hundreds of thousands of stolen credit card numbers online.

Of those suspects, half regularly used the open Wi-Fi connections of unsuspecting neighbors. Four suspects, in Canada, California and Florida, were logged in to neighbors' Wi-Fi networks at the moment law enforcement agents, having tracked them by other means, entered their homes and arrested them, Secret Service agents involved in the case said.

More than 10 million homes in the US now have a Wi-Fi base station providing a wireless Internet connection, according to ABI, a technology research firm in Oyster Bay, New York. There were essentially none as recently as 2000, the firm said. Those base stations, or routers, allow several computers to share a high-speed Internet connection and let users maintain that connection as they move about with laptops or other mobile devices. The routers are also used to connect computers with printers and other peripheral devices.

Experts say most of those households never turn on any of the features, available in almost all Wi-Fi routers, that change the system's default settings, conceal the connection from others and encrypt the data sent over it. Failure to secure the network in those ways can allow anyone with a Wi-Fi-enabled computer within about 60m to tap into the base station's Internet connection, typically a digital subscriber line or a cable modem.

Wi-Fi connections are also popping up in retail locations, but while chains like Starbucks take steps to protect their networks, independent coffee shops that offer Wi-Fi often leave their connections wide open, law enforcement officials say.

In addition, many universities are now blanketing their campuses with open Wi-Fi networks, and dozens of cities and towns are creating wireless grids. While some locations charge a fee or otherwise force users to register, others leave the network open. All that is needed to tap in is a Wi-Fi card, typically costing US$30 or less, for the user's PC or laptop. (Wi-Fi cards contain an identification code that is potentially traceable, but that information is not retained by most consumer routers, and the cards in any case can be readily removed and thrown away.)

When criminals operate online through a Wi-Fi network, law enforcement agents can track their activity to the numeric Internet Protocol address corresponding to that connection. But from there the trail may go cold, in the case of a public network, or lead to an innocent, if careless, owner of a wireless home network.

"We had this whole network set up to identify these guys, but the one thing we had to take into consideration was Wi-Fi," Gilhooly said. "If I get to an Internet address and I send a subpoena to the Internet provider and it gets me a name and physical address, how do I know that that person isn't actually bouncing in from next door?"

Gilhooly said the possibility of crashing into an innocent person's home forced his team to spend additional time conducting in-person surveillance before making arrests. Gilhooly said the suspects tracked for Operation Firewall would regularly advise one another on the best ways to gain access to unsecured Wi-Fi systems.

"We intercepted their private conversations and they would talk and brag about, `Oh yeah, I just got a new amplifier and a new antenna and I can reach a quarter of a mile,'" he said. "Hotels are wide open. Universities, wide open."

Sometimes, suspected criminals using Wi-Fi do not get out of their cars. At 5am one day in November 2003, the police in Toronto spotted a wrong-way driver "with a laptop on the passenger seat showing a child pornography movie that he had downloaded using the wireless connection in a nearby house," said Detective Sergeant Paul Gillespie, the officer in charge of the child exploitation section of the sex crimes unit for the Toronto police service.

The suspect was charged with child pornography violations in addition to theft of telecommunications services; the case is pending.

"The No. 1 challenge is that people are committing all sorts of criminal activity over the Internet using wireless, and it could trace back to somebody else," Gillespie said.

Holly Hubert, the supervisory special agent in charge of the Cyber Task Force at the FBI field office in Buffalo, New York, said the use of Wi-Fi was making it much more difficult to track down online criminals.

"This happens all the time, and it's definitely a challenge for us," she said. "We'll track something to a particular Internet Protocol address and it could be an unsuspecting business or home network that's been invaded. Oftentimes these are a dead end for us."

Hubert says one group of hackers she has been tracking has regularly frequented a local chain of Wi-Fi-equipped tea and coffee shops to help cover its tracks.

Many times the suspects can find a choice of unsecured wireless networks right from home. Special agent Bob Breeden, supervisor of the computer crime division for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, said a fraud investigation led in December to the arrest of a Tallahassee man who had used two Wi-Fi networks set up by residents in his apartment complex.

Over those Internet connections, the suspect used the electronic routing information for a local college's bank account to pay for online pornography and to order sex-related products, Breeden said. The man was caught because he inexplicably had the products delivered, in his name, to his actual address, Breeden said. When officers came to arrest him, they found his computer set up to connect to a neighbor's wireless network. Breeden said the suspect, Abdul Wattley, had pleaded guilty to charges of theft and unauthorized use of a communications network and been sentenced to two years' probation.

In another recent case, the principal of a Tallahassee high school had received death threats by e-mail, Breeden said. When authorities traced the messages to a certain Internet Protocol address and went to the household it corresponded to, Breeden said, "Dad has his laptop sitting on a table and Mom has another laptop, and of course they have Wi-Fi, and they clearly didn't know anything about the threats."

Cybercrime has been known to flourish even without Wi-Fi's cloak of anonymity; no such link has been established, for example, in the recent high-profile data thefts from ChoicePoint, Lexis/Nexis and other database companies.

But unsecured wireless networks are nonetheless being looked at by the authorities as a potential tool for furtive activities of many sorts, including terrorism. Two federal law enforcement officials said on condition of anonymity that while they were not aware of specific cases, they believed that sophisticated terrorists might also be starting to exploit unsecured Wi-Fi connections.

In the end, prevention is largely in the hands of the buyers and sellers of Wi-Fi equipment. Michael Coe, a spokesman for SBC, the US' No. 1 provider of digital subscriber line connections, said the company had provided about 1 million Wi-Fi routers to its customers with encryption turned on by default. But experts say most consumers who spend the US$60 to US$80 for a Wi-Fi router are happy just to make it work at all, and never turn on encryption.

"To some degree, most consumers are intimidated by the technology," said Roberta Wiggins, a wireless analyst at the Yankee Group, a technology research firm in Boston. "There is a behavior that they don't want to further complicate their options."

That attitude makes life easier for tech-savvy criminals and tougher for those who pursue them.

"The public needs to realize that all they're doing is making it harder on me to go find the bad guys," said Gilhooly, the former Secret Service agent.

"How would you feel if you're sitting at home and meanwhile someone is using your Wi-Fi to hack a bank or hack a company and downloads a million credit card numbers, which happens all the time? I come to you and knock on your door, and all you can say is, `Oops,'" Gilhooly said.