Not too long ago, tech enthusiasts were telling us that by this year, we would see self-driving vehicles hit the mainstream with about 10 million on the roads.
That turned out to be a wild overestimation. The number of vehicles in testing is thousands of times smaller and they are still driving mostly in controlled conditions.
Companies have also scaled back their ambitions, aiming more for driver support than full autonomy, just as sober-minded transport experts told us to expect.
However, slower development is probably just as well, as it should help improve vehicle safety and give engineers time to prepare for other threats, such as hackers turning vehicles into destructive weapons.
Slower rollout also gives us a chance to form some social consensus on the built-in ethics of autonomous vehicles, which would inevitably face decisions with moral implications — being forced to choose, for example, between killing the vehicle’s passengers by hitting a tree or veering into a nearby group of pedestrians.
Programmers would have to prepare vehicles to make such decisions when certain conditions arise and they would need some justifiable basis to do so.
This need is creating a somewhat bizarre research alliance, as professional ethicists work alongside experts in artificial intelligence. We have a lot to learn — and many mistakes to make — before we find acceptable solutions.
So far, only one national government has laid out actual guidelines for how autonomous vehicles should make decisions. That nation is Germany, where official guidelines take a strongly egalitarian view: “In the event of unavoidable accident situations, any distinction based on personal features (age, gender, physical or mental constitution) is strictly prohibited. It is also prohibited to offset victims against one another. General programming to reduce the number of personal injuries may be justifiable.”
This position tries to steer clear of any weighing of one person over another — male versus female, old versus young, skilled surgeon versus well-known local drug dealer. All people, in this view, count equally. This seems natural enough, although such egalitarian notions could run up against local cultural variations in moral attitudes.
A couple of years ago, researchers used a Web site to collect about 40 million choices involving theoretical self-driving dilemmas from people in 233 regions around the world, spanning many cultures.
They found that while people do generally prioritize human lives over animal lives, and they would like to save more rather than fewer lives, they also tend to prefer saving the young over the old.
People from countries in Central and South America tended to prioritize the lives of females and the physically fit.
In many regions, people also expressed a preference for high-status individuals — valuing an executive over a homeless individual.
Studies of this kind offer a rough guide to real moral preferences and how they vary from place to place, and trying to align with them might be a good starting point for engineers.
Even so, surveys cannot be the only guide, either, as prevailing moral attitudes change with time.
Historically, in many places, explicitly racist or sexist values have held sway, despite widely being viewed as unethical by most people.
A better way to identify reliable rules, some experts argue, would be to combine the survey-based approach with analysis based on prevailing ethical theories developed by moral philosophers.
One might start with public views, but then put these through the filter of ethical theory to see if a rule is, on closer scrutiny, truly defensible.
Ethicists refer to views that survive this test as “laundered preferences.” For example, all ethical theories would reject preferences for one gender over another, even though the survey found such preferences in some regions.
When a self-driving vehicle makes a choice and kills some children, it would not be obvious how that decision was made.
However, people would want to know and the rules at work had better survive systematic ethical scrutiny.
Mark Buchanan, a physicist and science writer, is the author of the book Forecast: What Physics, Meteorology and the Natural Sciences Can Teach Us About Economics.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, yesterday reported record sales for the first quarter, which analysts attributed to solid demand for emerging technologies. Consolidated revenue totaled NT$592.64 billion (US$18.51 billion) in the January-to-March period, up 16.5 percent from a year earlier, but down 5.26 percent from the previous quarter, TSMC said in a statement. The first-quarter revenue beat analysts’ average projection of NT$579.5 billion, Bloomberg News reported. That performance lends weight to expectations that the world’s most valuable chipmaker would return to solid growth this year after weathering a post-COVID-19-pandemic cratering of smartphone and computer sales. TSMC is budgeting
US CONSCULTANT: The US Department of Commerce’s Ursula Burns is a rarely seen US government consultant to be put forward to sit on the board, nominated as an independent director Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, yesterday nominated 10 candidates for its new board of directors, including Ursula Burns from the US Department of Commerce. It is rare that TSMC has nominated a US government consultant to sit on its board. Burns was nominated as one of seven independent directors. She is vice chair of the department’s Advisory Council on Supply Chain Competitiveness. Burns is to stand for election at TSMC’s annual shareholders’ meeting on June 4 along with the rest of the candidates. TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) was not on the list after in December last
FIRST FORAY: The maker of EUV pods said it plans to begin the construction of the plant later this year, with mass production expected to start next year Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登精密), the sole extreme ultraviolet (EUV) pod supplier to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), plans to build a plant in Japan in an effort to help customers boost supply chain resiliency, it said yesterday. The NT$500 million (US$15.52 million) investment is a response to requests by key customers to build capacity outside Taiwan and China amid escalating geopolitical tensions, it said. The plant would be built in Fukuoka Prefecture’s Kurume, which is about a one-hour drive from TSMC’s fab in Kumamoto Prefecture’s Kikuyo, Gudeng said. Gudeng plans to begin the construction of its first overseas plant later this