Apparel maker Makalot Industrial Co (聚陽) reported better-than-expected pretax profit for last quarter, a sign that the negative effects from a fire at a facility in Vietnam in July have ended, Yuanta Securities Investment Consulting Co (元大投顧) said on Wednesday last week.
Makalot’s operating margin improved 0.8 percentage points from a year earlier to 9.9 percent last quarter, with gross margin rising to 19.9 percent over the same period, reflecting efficient factory management after the incident, Yuanta said in a research note, adding that the company had no extra air shipping expenses for deferred orders in the July-to-September quarter.
Makalot received an insurance payment of NT$60 million to NT$70 million (US$1.96 million to US$2.29 million) from a policy that covered the fire, which affected two plants, Yuanta said.
It has replaced 80 to 90 percent of capacity lost in the incident through shuffling and outsourcing, Yuanta said.
Makalot has six plants in Vietnam. The two plants affected by the fire mainly produce low-end apparel for the US market and their combined pre-fire capacity was about 5 percent of overall output.
“We remain positive on the stock for the long term and view it as a key beneficiary of transferred orders from brand clients due to the [US-China] trade war,” Yuanta said.
Makalot, a manufacturer of ready-to-wear apparel and functional clothing, counts GAP Inc, Fast Retailing Co’s GU sub-brand, Kohl’s Corp, Target Corp, Walmart Inc and Hanesbrands Inc among its major clients.
In the first nine months of the year, cumulative revenue increased 15.53 percent annually to NT$20.6 billion, while pretax profit rose 34.28 percent to NT$1.95 billion in the same period.
Earnings per share were NT$8.88 from January to last month, the company said in a regulatory filing on Tuesday last week.
With order visibility of four months and some orders from last quarter deferred to this quarter, sales this quarter are forecast to grow 10 to 15 percent year-on-year, Yuanta said.
SinoPac Securities Investment Service Corp (永豐投顧) said in a separate note that Makalot’s two fire-affected plants are expected to be renovated and automated, before resuming mass production at the end of the first quarter next year.
While clients have become cautious given macro-economic conditions, the company is expected to benefit from increasing orders from brand clients and new industry dynamics, SinoPac Securities said on Tuesday last week.
“Structural changes in the apparel industry — such as rekindled demand for plain weave and fashion apparel — will help fuel the company’s operational momentum and gross margin expansion,” SinoPac Securities said. “In addition, clients Target and GU have powerful growth outlooks for 2020.”
However, the company’s capacity would remain tight over the next one or two years, as added capacity expected in the industry next year might be swiftly absorbed, SinoPac said.
Shares of Makalot rose 5.45 percent last week and closed at NT$174 on Friday in Taipei trading.
Yuanta retained its “buy” rating for Makalot, but cut its 12-month target price to NT$233 from NT$250 to reflect a more neutral sentiment, as growth is likely to be slower next year due to a high comparison base this year.
SinoPac also adjusted its target price from NT$244 to NT$216, citing a seasonal pattern for this quarter, when Makalot’s sales tend to be lower than the previous quarter.
‘BIG LOSS’: This year might see the last generation of Huawei’s Kirin chips, as their production would stop next month because they are made using US technology Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co (華為) is running out of processor chips to make smartphones due to US sanctions and would be forced to stop production of its own most advanced chips, a company executive has said, in a sign of growing damage to Huawei’s business from US pressure. Huawei, one of the biggest producers of smartphones and network equipment, is at the center of US-Chinese tension over technology and security. Washington last year cut off Huawei’s access to US components and technology, and those penalties were tightened in May, when the White House barred vendors worldwide from using US
CORPORATE SCANDAL: Cathay Life has invested NT$13.3 billion in Bank Mayapada since 2015, but the latest loss of NT$8.8 billion has completely written off its investment Cathay Life Insurance Co (國泰人壽) yesterday said it would recognize an investment loss of NT$8.8 billion (US$298.1 million) in Indonesia’s Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk PT due to concerns about the lender’s operations amid a corporate scandal. The company said it would revise its earnings result for June, from a net profit of NT$6.52 billion to a net loss of NT$520 million, its first monthly loss over the past 17 months. After booking an investment loss of NT$5.2 billion in Bank Mayapada earlier this year, Cathay Life has so far recognized total investment losses of NT$14 billion in the lender, executive vice president
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reported that revenue last month expanded 25 percent annually, but fell 12.8 percent month-on-month to NT$105.96 billion (US$3.59 billion). In the first seven months of this year, the chipmaker’s revenue surged 33.6 percent to NT$727.26 billion, compared with NT$544.46 billion a year earlier. TSMC has said it aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year. The company has since May 15 stopped taking new orders from Huawei Technologies Co (華為), its second-biggest customer after Apple Inc, due to the US’ restrictions on exports containing US technologies. TSMC has no plans to
The US stock market has been on a tear, yet the country’s economy is in the dumps. So why do so many people believe — undoubtedly incorrectly — that the stock market has decoupled from reality? The economy many people experience, while bleak, is local, personal and, for the most part, either not publicly traded or plays only a small part in the stock market’s moves. To explain why these personal experiences have so little effect on equity markets, we must look more closely at the market role of the weakest industry sectors. The surprising conclusion: The most visible and economically vulnerable