Sun, Oct 20, 2019 - Page 16 News List

World’s longest flights are not meant for cattle class

By David Fickling  /  Bloomberg Opinion

The question about Qantas Airways Ltd’s plans to start 20-hour direct flights from Sydney to London and New York is not why any passenger would want to take the route — it is why any carrier would want to offer them.

For all the hardship of spending a day cooped up with the body odors of a couple of hundred other humans, long-haul flying is not a particularly attractive business for airlines, either.

Qantas’ international unit made just A$0.107 of revenue per seat per kilometer flown in its last fiscal year through June, of which A$0.103 was eaten up by operating costs. If you fly the roughly 17,000km between London and Sydney and buy a decent bottle of liquor at duty free, the A$70 (US$48) you would spend would quite possibly be more money than the operating profit Qantas made on your ticket for the entire flight.

Qantas’ Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd budget carrier makes about twice the profit per kilometer that the international business brings in and its mainline domestic unit is five times more profitable.

So what gives? Establishing ultra-long-haul routes is no easy task. Qantas is modifying in-flight menus and lighting patterns and using its staff as guinea pigs in a test flight this weekend to examine how passengers will cope with such a long journey.

Costs do not explain it. Indeed, they are likely to be somewhat worse on direct ultra-long-haul flights than on more conventional routes. On a fully laden twin-aisle passenger jet, fuel will often weigh more than all the passengers and cargo. Breaking the journey and refueling en route at a hub airport is a good way of keeping costs down, because it means that you do not have to carry fuel for the second “leg” of the flight.

However, revenue is a different matter. Qantas’ domestic business is so profitable, because it has a single struggling rival, Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd. Despite flying more passengers in the 12 months through June than it did six years earlier, Australia’s domestic aviation network operated fewer flights. That is possible because the muted competition between Qantas and Virgin gives them the discipline to keep a lid on capacity growth, allowing more people to be squeezed onto each plane and keeping prices high.

International routes are not normally like that. At least a dozen different airlines typically compete to ferry passengers between Australia and Europe, and those with hub airports mid-route can easily serve multiple destinations in a way that would be crippling to an end-of-line carrier like Qantas.

The partnership between Qantas and Emirates Airline, which started in 2013, was intended to get around this problem by funneling the Australian carrier’s passengers onto the huge network operated by its Gulf partner. While that has helped return the international unit to profit, margins are vanishingly thin.

Ultra-long-haul flights are best understood as a way for the likes of Qantas to reverse the disadvantage that this tyranny of distance engenders. It will never have the network and operations to compete with the geographic advantages of hub carriers in moving passengers between Australia, Europe and North America.

However, if it can tempt the more profitable premium passengers away from hub airports with a more direct route, it at least has some ammunition on its side next time it enters negotiations with Emirates about how to share revenues from their flights.

This story has been viewed 2501 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top