Environmentally friendly finance is blooming thanks to investors willing to weigh profits against ecology, but decisions about meaningful investments can be complex.
At first sight the idea of “green finance” as a vehicle to protect the environment or help businesses in their transition toward a more sustainable future seems non-controversial.
However, green finance lumps together a dizzying array of options and a debate is raging over which ones are truly worthy of green investor money — and which are not.
Photo: EPA-EFE
What about, say, oil companies? No way, respond critics, pointing to the damage that the exploration and use of fossil fuel has done to the planet.
However, others say it would be ecologically responsible to help oil majors shift toward a greener future by developing alternative energy sources.
Nuclear energy is another hot potato. The industry was once unanimously reviled as the archenemy by the environmental movement, but some now admit that the absence of damaging greenhouse gases from nuclear power stations has given them pause.
A decade after the launch of the early green bonds — long-term borrowing for environmental projects — investors’ options have grown dramatically, but the share of green instruments in global finance is still small.
“Green bond issuance in 2018 so far have reached US$156.8 billion, which is around 2 percent of the global bond market,” said Frederic Gabizon, head of debt capital markets at HSBC France.
“This may seem marginal, but growth has been exponential since the start,” he said, adding that investors needed to take the long view given the slow pace of green infrastructure growth.
Pressure from civil society, governments and private citizens has prompted money professionals to look beyond purely financial motives as they respond to green investor interest, and to polish their image along the way.
It is true that green investments rarely outperform traditional placements in terms of short-term yields, but modern investors seem to be taking a broader view than just monetary returns.
“We’re seeing a new young generation of savers coming through now, who want slightly different things,” said Rob Hardy, head of EMEA corporate governance at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
“There is no point in earning a lot of money if you can’t breathe the air,” he said.
There is no binding global regulatory framework as yet for green finance, but most professionals apply the so-called “green bonds principles” issued by the International Capital Market Association to their own operations.
In a wind farm project, for example, the borrower must prove that the money really was used for the farm’s construction and be able to provide an exact measure of the project’s environmental impact.
External auditing has also become commonplace, said Rahul Ghosh, senior vice president for global environmental, social and governance questions at Moody’s.
“Today in Europe, I believe more than 95 percent of green bonds issued in the market will carry some sort of external review,” he said.
This trend, he said, was particularly important to combat “greenwashing,” the attempt to put an environmentally friendly spin on practices that are actually harmful.
“Even if the methodologies have not all been standardized, we are starting to have tools to tackle the complexity of this subject,” said Sandrine Enguehard, a green finance specialist at French bank Societe Generale SA.
“You can’t just limit yourself to measuring pollution at the end of an exhaust pipe,” she said.
Experts have said that evaluating the carbon footprint of a wind turbine is relatively easy, but what about the complexity of measuring the environmental impact of an urban rehabilitation program?
“As an investor, you have to do your homework, spend some time to be sure it isn’t greenwashing,” said Bram Bos, a green bond portfolio manager at NN Investment Partners, an asset management firm.
However, greenwashing is still very common, according to the French Social Investment Forum, an association promoting responsible finance.
“Although outright lies are very rare thankfully, there are still bad practices and some people abuse the ecology argument,” it said.
However, if they do, they risk losing their good name in the investment community with serious consequences, said Stephane Marciel, head of Sustainable Bonds at Societe Generale.
“Reputation is a very powerful weapon,” he said. “If funds are not used properly, the borrower’s reputation is ruined and they lose access to the market.”
DECOUPLING? In a sign of deeper US-China technology decoupling, Apple has held initial talks about using Baidu’s generative AI technology in its iPhones, the Wall Street Journal said China has introduced guidelines to phase out US microprocessors from Intel Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) from government PCs and servers, the Financial Times reported yesterday. The procurement guidance also seeks to sideline Microsoft Corp’s Windows operating system and foreign-made database software in favor of domestic options, the report said. Chinese officials have begun following the guidelines, which were unveiled in December last year, the report said. They order government agencies above the township level to include criteria requiring “safe and reliable” processors and operating systems when making purchases, the newspaper said. The US has been aiming to boost domestic semiconductor
Nvidia Corp earned its US$2.2 trillion market cap by producing artificial intelligence (AI) chips that have become the lifeblood powering the new era of generative AI developers from start-ups to Microsoft Corp, OpenAI and Google parent Alphabet Inc. Almost as important to its hardware is the company’s nearly 20 years’ worth of computer code, which helps make competition with the company nearly impossible. More than 4 million global developers rely on Nvidia’s CUDA software platform to build AI and other apps. Now a coalition of tech companies that includes Qualcomm Inc, Google and Intel Corp plans to loosen Nvidia’s chokehold by going
ENERGY IMPACT: The electricity rate hike is expected to add about NT$4 billion to TSMC’s electricity bill a year and cut its annual earnings per share by about NT$0.154 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) has left its long-term gross margin target unchanged despite the government deciding on Friday to raise electricity rates. One of the heaviest power consuming manufacturers in Taiwan, TSMC said it always respects the government’s energy policy and would continue to operate its fabs by making efforts in energy conservation. The chipmaker said it has left a long-term goal of more than 53 percent in gross margin unchanged. The Ministry of Economic Affairs concluded a power rate evaluation meeting on Friday, announcing electricity tariffs would go up by 11 percent on average to about NT$3.4518 per kilowatt-hour (kWh)
OPENING ADDRESS: The CEO is to give a speech on the future of high-performance computing and artificial intelligence at the trade show’s opening on June 3, TAITRA said Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) chairperson and chief executive officer Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) is to deliver the opening keynote speech at Computex Taipei this year, the event’s organizer said in a statement yesterday. Su is to give a speech on the future of high-performance computing (HPC) in the artificial intelligence (AI) era to open Computex, one of the world’s largest computer and technology trade events, at 9:30am on June 3, the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) said. Su is to explore how AMD and the company’s strategic technology partners are pushing the limits of AI and HPC, from data centers to