Microsoft Corp has won a US$480 million contract to supply prototypes for augmented-reality (AR) systems for use on combat missions and in training, the US Army said.
The contract, which could eventually lead to the military purchasing more than 100,000 headsets, is intended to “increase lethality by enhancing the ability to detect, decide and engage before the enemy,” according to a government description of the program.
“Augmented reality technology will provide troops with more and better information to make decisions. This new work extends our long-standing, trusted relationship with the [US] Department of Defense to this new area,” a Microsoft spokesman said in an e-mailed statement.
The US Army and the Israeli military have already used Microsoft’s HoloLens devices in training, but plans for live combat would be a significant step forward.
HoloLens is one of the leading consumer-grade headsets, but a large consumer market does not yet exist; a video made for the European Patent Office this spring said it had sold about 50,000 devices.
That is about half the number the US Army expects to buy through its augmented-reality program, which is called the Integrated Visual Augmentation System, or IVAS.
With the contract, the US Army immediately becomes one of Microsoft’s most important HoloLens consumers. It expects devices to vary from their consumer-grade counterparts in a handful of key respects.
In a document shared with companies bidding on the contract, the army said it wanted to incorporate night vision and thermal sensing, measure vital signs like breathing and “readiness,” monitor for concussions and offer hearing protection.
It said the winning bidder would be expected to deliver 2,500 headsets within two years and exhibit the capacity for full-scale production.
The contract went though a bidding process designed to encourage the army to do business with companies that are not traditional defense contractors.
Magic Leap, which makes the main competitor to HoloLens for the consumer market, also pursued the contract.
In early August, the army held meetings with 25 companies interested in participating in some way, including Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp, Lockheed Martin Corp and Raytheon Co.
The technology industry’s cooperation with the US military and law enforcement has become increasingly tense over the past year, with employees at companies like Alphabet Inc’s Google and Amazon.com Inc pushing back against government contracts.
Earlier this year, hundreds of Microsoft workers signed a petition criticizing a contract with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement that the company had originally said included some of its artificial-intelligence software.
Last month, a blog post purportedly written by Microsoft employees urged the company not to bid on a multibillion-dollar US military cloud contract.
“Many Microsoft employees don’t believe that what we build should be used for waging war,” they wrote.
Later that month, Microsoft president and chief legal officer Brad Smith said the company would continue to sell software to the US military.
Smith wrote that employees with ethical qualms with projects would be allowed to move to other work within the company.
”Artificial intelligence, augmented reality and other technologies are raising new and profoundly important issues, including the ability of weapons to act autonomously. As we have discussed these issues with governments, we’ve appreciated that no military in the world wants to wake up to discover that machines have started a war,” he wrote. “But we can’t expect these new developments to be addressed wisely if the people in the tech sector who know the most about technology withdraw from the conversation.”
POOR INTERNAL CONTROLS: Insurance Bureau Director-General Shih Chiung-hwa said the company is expected to get back on track while its chairman is suspended The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) yesterday fined Shin Kong Life Insurance Co (新光人壽) NT$27.6 million (US$939,415) for a reckless investment that endangered its solvency, and suspended its chairman Eugene Wu (吳東進) for poor supervision. The penalty is the second-highest in a single case after Nan Shan Life Insurance Co (南山人壽) was fined NT$30 million in September last year and its chairman Du Ying-tzyong (杜英宗) suspended for two years, the commission said. In three rounds of special and regular examinations conducted since last year, the commission found that Shin Kong Life had given too much power to an asset and liability management committee
Tesla Inc is planning to ship vehicles made at its Shanghai Gigafactory to other markets in Asia and Europe, people familiar with the matter said, as the company looks to realize its plan to reduce shipping costs and manufacture vehicles closer to customers. China-built Tesla Model 3s intended for delivery outside China would likely start mass production in the fourth quarter of the year, the people said, asking not to be identified because the details are private. They said the markets targeted include Singapore, Australia and New Zealand, as well as Europe, where customers currently have to wait for a Tesla to
Nano-X Imaging Ltd, a start-up founded by Israeli investor Ran Poliakine, is joining forces with South Korean chipmaker SK Hynix Inc to build a machine that could disrupt a century-old X-ray industry. Valued at about US$2 billion after listing on the NASDAQ last month, Nano-X is seeking to transform a multibillion-dollar industry that has essentially relied on the same technology since Nobel Prize in Physics winner Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays in the late 19th century. Nano-X’s device uses semiconductors instead of metal filaments to generate X-rays. The backing of SK Hynix, the world’s second-largest maker of memory chips, is a boost for
Continental AG, which makes control units for Daimler AG cars, cannot pursue antitrust claims against a group of patent owners, including Qualcomm Inc, which are seeking royalties on telecommunications technology, a federal judge in Texas ruled. Avanci LLC, a licensing pool formed by Qualcomm, Nokia Oyj, Sharp Corp and other owners of patents on technology standards, is not breaching antitrust laws when it negotiates license agreements with automakers rather than the component makers, Barbara Lynn, chief district judge for the Northern District of Texas, said in dismissing the suit in a decision posted on Friday. The licensing group charges US$15 per vehicle