Thu, Nov 08, 2018 - Page 10 News List

Qualcomm dealt blow in antitrust suit

MONOPOLY ABUSE:The US Federal Trade Commission said the chipmaker’s refusal to license patents to rivals like Intel was part of a scheme to maintain its monopoly

Bloomberg

Qualcomm Inc chief executive Steve Mollenkopf speaks at the opening ceremony of the fifth World Internet Conference in Wuzhen, China, yesterday.

Photo: Reuters

Qualcomm Inc has suffered a setback in its fight with US antitrust regulators who accuse the semiconductor maker of abusing a monopoly in chips for cellphones and raising costs for consumers.

US District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, on Tuesday sided with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on part of the agency’s antitrust case against Qualcomm ahead of a trial scheduled to start early next year.

In her ruling, Koh said Qualcomm was required to license patents under commitments the company made to industry groups to provide licenses on fair and reasonable terms.

The FTC said Qualcomm’s refusal to license patents to competitors like Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co was part of a scheme to maintain its monopoly.

While Koh did not rule on central parts of the FTC’s case against Qualcomm, the decision gives a boost to the commission ahead of a trial set to begin in January.

The lawsuit represents the most significant case in years brought by antitrust enforcers against a company accused of abusing a monopoly.

It could also make Qualcomm more willing to settle.

Both sides said in a court filing last month that they were discussing a possible settlement and had asked Koh to defer her ruling, a request she denied.

Representatives of the FTC and Qualcomm did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Qualcomm is trying to fend off a series of legal and regulatory challenges to its business practices around the world, including a suit by Apple Inc, one of its largest customers.

The chipmaker derives most of its profits from selling the rights to use patents that are essential to all modern mobile phone systems.

Many of the cases target the link between those license fees and the company’s semiconductor business.

The crux of the FTC’s case against Qualcomm is the claim that it offered Apple rebates on licensing fees in return for that company’s exclusive use of Qualcomm modem chips in the iPhone from 2011 to 2016.

Citing agreements between the two companies, the FTC said in its complaint that Qualcomm intended to create exclusive deals that effectively foreclosed its competitors from gaining processor business at Apple.

Qualcomm had argued that it was only required to license its standard-essential patents to companies that supply complete devices, such as phonemakers, but not companies that supply components.

The company has also said it allows chipmaker competitors to use its intellectual property in their designs and has not taken action against them, negating the need for licenses.

This story has been viewed 1280 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top