Bird Rides Inc, a start-up that deploys electric scooters with location trackers on city sidewalks and rents them through an app, trumpeted two weeks ago that it was bringing its service to San Francisco.
The company, run by a former honcho at both Uber Technologies Inc and Lyft Inc, said it was determined to make sure everything went smoothly with city officials.
It failed. On Monday, San Francisco sent cease and desist letters to Bird Rides and two other motorized scooter companies, LimeBike and Spin.
Photo: Bloomberg
The business practices of all three companies “create a public nuisance and are unlawful,” San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera wrote.
The city has been warning the companies for weeks, he said.
Herrera presented the companies with a list of changes the city wants them to make and demanded written progress reports by the end of this month.
GPS-enabled scooters and bicycles are spreading across several major US cities, driven by a wave of venture capital into a handful of companies.
Policymakers are scrambling to find ways to regulate the great scooter boom of this year.
San Francisco’s board of supervisors on Tuesday passed a bill requiring electric scooter rental companies to get city permits.
The transportation department in Austin, Texas, on Tuesday presented lawmakers with its own plan to regulate scooters, and asked for an emergency vote by the full council by Thursday.
In Washington, a pilot program granting permits to electric scooters and bike-rental companies is set to expire soon.
Bird and LimeBike — the two largest companies in the US market — run similar services that involve leaving a bunch of scooters around town, letting smartphone-toting people unlock them for a small fee and scoot from place to place. Each company has raised more than US$100 million in the past six months, and both make idealistic claims about solving urban congestion and reducing reliance on automobiles.
LimeBike also rents bicycles, as does Uber, which got into the game last week with the acquisition of Jump Bikes.
However, problems quickly became apparent. Unused vehicles create new obstacles for pedestrians walking or running on sidewalks. In at least two cases, the vehicles were abandoned in local waterways. There was nothing to keep people from riding them on sidewalks or without helmets, both violations of municipal laws.
In short, scooting is a pretty good parable on the excesses and hubris of the technology industry. It provides a convenient service that generates a lot of excitement among its users — San Franciscans have already taken tens of thousands of rides on Birds — but also generates ill effects for the rest of the population.
Companies promise to figure out the problems, but they are mostly focused on outgrowing one another. They tend to see anything that slows them down as either wrongheaded, ignorable or both.
Bird and LimeBike said they are committed to working with officials to address their concerns.
Bird on Tuesday rolled out a potential solution to the parking issue. It is to require people to take a photograph of where they left the scooter at the end of their rides.
The firm would likely implement this in many cities, Bird chief legal officer David Estrada said, but declined to provide specifics.
Bird’s Uber-style approach to introducing the service — making it available to the public without a lengthy negotiation with each city over policy — is better for everyone, said Estrada, who previously helped get Lyft off the ground and worked on driverless-car policy at Alphabet Inc’s Google.
“We actually think we’ve helped create better regulation, because now we have data,” he said.
This process grates on many people who have gone through it before, causing flashbacks to Uber under its controversial cofounder Travis Kalanick.
In San Francisco, expressing an opinion about scooting is, in effect, casting a vote in the long-running referendum about the cultural mores of tech bros. Supporters sing the virtues of cheap and accessible transportation with the promise of reduced traffic and cleaner air. Critics say the service gives rich tech employees a whimsical way to bar-hop at the expense of crowded and dangerous sidewalks. The more scooters, the greater strain on the city. Tech companies, they say, are often blind to these tradeoffs.
“The silver lining of the Bird scooter fiasco is that it’s a great way for econ teachers to explain negative externalities and the tragedy of the commons,” former Wired editor Chris Anderson wrote on Twitter.
The parallels to ride-hailing are irresistible. Uber constantly butted heads with officials in its hometown and practically every other city it charged into.
Santa Monica, California, where Bird is based, sued the company soon after it rolled out, and the two sides eventually reached a settlement allowing Bird to continue operating.
Companies looking to disrupt transportation do not have the same incentives as the governments tasked with regulating it.
“There is a nature to our streets that is a tension between chaos and order. The more you try to create order, the more you infringe upon innovation,” said Adie Tomer, a fellow at the Metropolitan Policy Program of the Brookings Institution.
Many officials came away from their fights with Uber and Lyft doubting the good faith of tech companies, Tomer said. “All the ingredients are there to have that kind of scarring.”
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
Taiwan Transport and Storage Corp (TTS, 台灣通運倉儲) yesterday unveiled its first electric tractor unit — manufactured by Volvo Trucks — in a ceremony in Taipei, and said the unit would soon be used to transport cement produced by Taiwan Cement Corp (TCC, 台灣水泥). Both TTS and TCC belong to TCC International Holdings Ltd (台泥國際集團). With the electric tractor unit, the Taipei-based cement firm would become the first in Taiwan to use electric vehicles to transport construction materials. TTS chairman Koo Kung-yi (辜公怡), Volvo Trucks vice president of sales and marketing Johan Selven, TCC president Roman Cheng (程耀輝) and Taikoo Motors Group
MAJOR DROP: CEO Tim Cook, who is visiting Hanoi, pledged the firm was committed to Vietnam after its smartphone shipments declined 9.6% annually in the first quarter Apple Inc yesterday said it would increase spending on suppliers in Vietnam, a key production hub, as CEO Tim Cook arrived in the country for a two-day visit. The iPhone maker announced the news in a statement on its Web site, but gave no details of how much it would spend or where the money would go. Cook is expected to meet programmers, content creators and students during his visit, online newspaper VnExpress reported. The visit comes as US President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to ramp up Vietnam’s role in the global tech supply chain to reduce the US’ dependence on China. Images on
New apartments in Taiwan’s major cities are getting smaller, while old apartments are increasingly occupied by older people, many of whom live alone, government data showed. The phenomenon has to do with sharpening unaffordable property prices and an aging population, property brokers said. Apartments with one bedroom that are two years old or older have gained a noticeable presence in the nation’s six special municipalities as well as Hsinchu county and city in the past five years, Evertrust Rehouse Co (永慶房產集團) found, citing data from the government’s real-price transaction platform. In Taipei, apartments with one bedroom accounted for 19 percent of deals last