Bird Rides Inc, a start-up that deploys electric scooters with location trackers on city sidewalks and rents them through an app, trumpeted two weeks ago that it was bringing its service to San Francisco.
The company, run by a former honcho at both Uber Technologies Inc and Lyft Inc, said it was determined to make sure everything went smoothly with city officials.
It failed. On Monday, San Francisco sent cease and desist letters to Bird Rides and two other motorized scooter companies, LimeBike and Spin.
The business practices of all three companies “create a public nuisance and are unlawful,” San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera wrote.
The city has been warning the companies for weeks, he said.
Herrera presented the companies with a list of changes the city wants them to make and demanded written progress reports by the end of this month.
GPS-enabled scooters and bicycles are spreading across several major US cities, driven by a wave of venture capital into a handful of companies.
Policymakers are scrambling to find ways to regulate the great scooter boom of this year.
San Francisco’s board of supervisors on Tuesday passed a bill requiring electric scooter rental companies to get city permits.
The transportation department in Austin, Texas, on Tuesday presented lawmakers with its own plan to regulate scooters, and asked for an emergency vote by the full council by Thursday.
In Washington, a pilot program granting permits to electric scooters and bike-rental companies is set to expire soon.
Bird and LimeBike — the two largest companies in the US market — run similar services that involve leaving a bunch of scooters around town, letting smartphone-toting people unlock them for a small fee and scoot from place to place. Each company has raised more than US$100 million in the past six months, and both make idealistic claims about solving urban congestion and reducing reliance on automobiles.
LimeBike also rents bicycles, as does Uber, which got into the game last week with the acquisition of Jump Bikes.
However, problems quickly became apparent. Unused vehicles create new obstacles for pedestrians walking or running on sidewalks. In at least two cases, the vehicles were abandoned in local waterways. There was nothing to keep people from riding them on sidewalks or without helmets, both violations of municipal laws.
In short, scooting is a pretty good parable on the excesses and hubris of the technology industry. It provides a convenient service that generates a lot of excitement among its users — San Franciscans have already taken tens of thousands of rides on Birds — but also generates ill effects for the rest of the population.
Companies promise to figure out the problems, but they are mostly focused on outgrowing one another. They tend to see anything that slows them down as either wrongheaded, ignorable or both.
Bird and LimeBike said they are committed to working with officials to address their concerns.
Bird on Tuesday rolled out a potential solution to the parking issue. It is to require people to take a photograph of where they left the scooter at the end of their rides.
The firm would likely implement this in many cities, Bird chief legal officer David Estrada said, but declined to provide specifics.
Bird’s Uber-style approach to introducing the service — making it available to the public without a lengthy negotiation with each city over policy — is better for everyone, said Estrada, who previously helped get Lyft off the ground and worked on driverless-car policy at Alphabet Inc’s Google.
“We actually think we’ve helped create better regulation, because now we have data,” he said.
This process grates on many people who have gone through it before, causing flashbacks to Uber under its controversial cofounder Travis Kalanick.
In San Francisco, expressing an opinion about scooting is, in effect, casting a vote in the long-running referendum about the cultural mores of tech bros. Supporters sing the virtues of cheap and accessible transportation with the promise of reduced traffic and cleaner air. Critics say the service gives rich tech employees a whimsical way to bar-hop at the expense of crowded and dangerous sidewalks. The more scooters, the greater strain on the city. Tech companies, they say, are often blind to these tradeoffs.
“The silver lining of the Bird scooter fiasco is that it’s a great way for econ teachers to explain negative externalities and the tragedy of the commons,” former Wired editor Chris Anderson wrote on Twitter.
The parallels to ride-hailing are irresistible. Uber constantly butted heads with officials in its hometown and practically every other city it charged into.
Santa Monica, California, where Bird is based, sued the company soon after it rolled out, and the two sides eventually reached a settlement allowing Bird to continue operating.
Companies looking to disrupt transportation do not have the same incentives as the governments tasked with regulating it.
“There is a nature to our streets that is a tension between chaos and order. The more you try to create order, the more you infringe upon innovation,” said Adie Tomer, a fellow at the Metropolitan Policy Program of the Brookings Institution.
Many officials came away from their fights with Uber and Lyft doubting the good faith of tech companies, Tomer said. “All the ingredients are there to have that kind of scarring.”
END TO SPECULATION: The hotel’s management contract has been extended, despite reports that it wanted to end its alliance with Hyatt Hotels over a deal with Riant Capital Singapore-based Hong Leong Hotel Development Ltd (豐隆大飯店股份) yesterday said it has extended a management contract to ensure the continued presence of the Grand Hyatt brand in Taipei, ending rumors that the two sides were parting ways. “We are pleased Hyatt is able to come to terms on the extension of the management contract of Grand Hyatt Taipei,” said Kwek Leng Beng (郭令明), executive chairman of City Developments Ltd (城市發展) and Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Ltd (千禧國敦酒店). Hong Leong Hotel Development is a subsidiary of Millennium, and both fall under the Hong Leong Group (豐隆集團). The Grand Hyatt Taipei (台北君悅大飯店), owned and built by
’WHITE BOX’: The open platform would give local firms access to Cisco’s cloud-based mobile network to develop 5G telecom equipment and tap into the global market The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday introduced a new 5G “open lab” in collaboration with US-based information technology and networking giant Cisco Systems Inc to address the rapidly growing “white box” 5G networking equipment market. The open lab will be a platform where Taiwanese manufacturers can access Cisco’s cloud-based mobile network to develop their own 5G telecom equipment, such as small-cell base stations, network switches, modems and Internet of things (IoT) devices, a ministry statement said. The open platform would allow Taiwanese manufacturers to tap into the lucrative 5G telecom equipment market, which was previously monopolized by Nokia Oyj, Ericsson AB
Nintendo Co is raising its target for Switch production to about 25 million units this fiscal year, people familiar with the matter said, as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic keeps lifting demand and component shortages ease. The Kyoto, Japan-based company, which in April hiked orders to 22 million units by March next year, is asking partners to tack on another few million units, said the people, who did not want to be identified discussing internal goals. Assembly partners plan to work at maximum capacity through December. The new production target suggests that Nintendo is likely to outperform its Switch sales forecast of 19 million
‘BIG LOSS’: This year might see the last generation of Huawei’s Kirin chips, as their production would stop next month because they are made using US technology Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co (華為) is running out of processor chips to make smartphones due to US sanctions and would be forced to stop production of its own most advanced chips, a company executive has said, in a sign of growing damage to Huawei’s business from US pressure. Huawei, one of the biggest producers of smartphones and network equipment, is at the center of US-Chinese tension over technology and security. Washington last year cut off Huawei’s access to US components and technology, and those penalties were tightened in May, when the White House barred vendors worldwide from using US