Thu, Apr 05, 2018 - Page 10 News List

Buybacks are popular, but they do have a downside

SHORT-TERM THINKING:A study conducted in 2015 found that share buybacks could have a negative effect on a company’s research and development spending


Share buybacks are all the rage among the world’s companies, to the delight of many shareholders, but not of critics who say they are lazy, short-sighted and mostly designed to enrich corporate fat cats.

Be it Adidas AG and Total SA in Europe or Cisco Systems Inc and Boeing Co in the US, big names are rushing to announce such buybacks, which involve using surplus cash to pick up the company’s own stock in the open market.

Usually the shares are then canceled, meaning the company’s value is now spread over fewer shares.

Share buybacks are not new, but this year portends to be a particularly big year for such operations, said TrimTabs, an independent institutional research firm in the US.

US firms have already announced US$226 billion in share buybacks since the beginning of the year.

A JPMorgan Chase & Co analyst said they are expecting US$800 billion from companies listed on the S&P 500 alone this year, up from US$530 million last year, thanks in no small part to US President Donald Trump’s tax reforms.

Companies, sitting on big profits from last year when the economy grew briskly, need to decide whether to plough the cash back into the business, or give it back to shareholders, either via dividends or share buybacks.

US firms tend to opt for buybacks, a choice that is becoming more frequent in Europe as well.

“Share buybacks are an option that provides more flexibility than dividends, but for shareholders turns out to be the same, expect for tax treatment,” BNP Paribas SA chief economist William de Vijlder said.

By going for the shares option rather than a cash payout, companies support their share price, which typically increases in such operations.

As there is less stock in circulation, they also mechanically boost their profits per share, a measure of performance that market analysts consider key.

Some observers suspect that the enthusiasm of top managers for share buybacks might also be motivated by boosting the value of the variable part of their remuneration package, which often includes stock options and outright share allocations.

“The remuneration incentive of executives based on the share price is without a doubt behind this increase in share buybacks,” ESCP Europe business school professor Christophe Moussu said.

Dividends and share buybacks have doubled in 15 years, he added.

While most shareholders welcome share buybacks — which can reach billions of dollars per company — some experts call them a manifestation of short-term thinking by corporate leaders.

Larry Fink, chief executive officer of the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock Inc, has criticized share buybacks for undermining a company’s long-term strategy.

A 2015 study by US economist Heitor Almeida found that share buybacks can have a detrimental effect on research and development spending.

“When a company buys its shares, that is saying it doesn’t have anything better to do with its cash, which is somewhat worrying from an investment perspective,” said Patrick Artus, a chief economist at French corporate and investment bank Natixis SA.

“There is an issue, but is there a problem?” de Vijlder said. “We could also ask how shareholders accept companies having way too much cash, which is saying that part of their assets aren’t bringing in anything.”

For Artus, it has not been investment that has suffered from the cash spent on share buybacks.

This story has been viewed 2188 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top