Wed, Feb 07, 2018 - Page 10 News List

Waymo accuses Uber of ‘cheating,’ stealing secrets

Reuters, SAN FRANCISCO

Uber Technologies Inc was either a cheating competitor willing to break the law to win the race to develop self-driving cars, or the victim of an unproven conspiracy theory stitched together by its main rival, Alphabet Inc’s Waymo, jurors heard in opening statements of a trade secrets trial on Monday.

The first salvos were delivered to a 10-person jury in San Francisco federal court in a civil lawsuit that could help determine who emerges in the forefront of the autonomous car business nearly a year after Alphabet’s self-driving car unit sued rival Uber.

The case hinges on whether Uber used apparent trade secrets to advance its autonomous vehicle program.

Waymo alleges that its former engineer Anthony Levandowski in December 2015 downloaded more than 14,000 confidential files containing designs for autonomous vehicles before going to work for Uber and leading its self-driving car unit in 2016.

“Waymo wants you to believe that Anthony Levandowski got together with Uber as part of some grand conspiracy to cheat and take trade secrets,” Uber attorney Bill Carmody said in his opening statement to the jury. “But like most conspiracy stories it just doesn’t make sense when you get the whole story.”

Waymo attorney Charles Verhoeven told the jury that the competitive pressures were so great to develop self-driving cars that then-Uber chief executive Travis Kalanick decided that “winning was more important than obeying the law.”

“Losing was not an option,” for Uber in the battle where “one competitor decided they needed to win at all costs,” Verhoeven said.

“We’re bringing this case because Uber is cheating. They took our technology ... to win this race at all costs,” he said.

Carmody said that the “elephant in the courtroom” was that, despite the downloads by Levandowski, Google’s proprietary information never made it to Uber and into its self-driving technology.

“There is no connection whatsoever between any files he downloaded ... and what’s in here,” Carmody said, pointing to an Uber-designed Lidar sensor sitting in front of him, a light-based sensor that is crucial to autonomous driving and central to the case.

“There’s not a single piece of Google proprietary information at Uber,” he added. “Nothing, zero, period.”

After what is expected to be two weeks of testimony, the jury will have to decide whether the eight apparent trade secrets on which the case hinges were indeed such, and not common knowledge, and whether Uber improperly acquired them, used them and benefited from them.

Levandowski, regarded as a visionary in autonomous technology, is not a defendant in the case, but is on Waymo’s witness list.

Levandowski was fired from Uber in May last year because the company said he refused to cooperate with Uber in the Waymo lawsuit and did not hand over information requested of him in the case.

Waymo and Uber are part of a crowded field of automakers and technology companies competing to build fleets of self-driving cars that could transform urban transportation systems.

Waymo has estimated damages in the case at about US$1.9 billion. Uber rejects the financial damages claim.

Still, the lawsuit has hobbled Uber’s self-driving car program, with Carmody telling the judge in a pre-trial hearing that the case “is the biggest in the history of Uber.”

This story has been viewed 1708 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top