“Reciprocity” has become the new buzzword in the US business community in China, with some industry leaders saying they would welcome a tougher approach from US President Donald Trump’s administration in opening up the markets of the world’s second-largest economy.
It is a striking shift within the US community in China, which had long-lobbied Washington against taking more aggressive policies, fearing they could draw retribution from China’s leaders.
US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer have in the past backed the reciprocity principle when it comes to China: That Beijing should provide the same access and benefits to US business in China that Washington gives the Chinese in the US.
“Our membership has moved to some extent in that direction as well, in advocating a firmer posture with respect to China,” American Chamber of Commerce in China policy committee chairman Lester Ross said.
He made the remarks last month after the group issued a report that found more than 60 percent of the chamber’s members had “little or no confidence that the Chinese government is committed to opening markets further in the next three years.”
Many sectors of China’s economy are either off limits or severely restricted to foreign investors.
For example foreign banks in China account for less than 2 percent of total assets, according to the China Banking Regulatory Commission.
A 50 percent ownership cap for foreign life insurers, despite China’s 2001 WTO commitments to lift it, has helped limit their market share to about 6 percent.
On the other hand, China’s Anbang Insurance Group (安邦保險集團) has spent more than US$8 billion acquiring US assets, including the Waldorf Astoria Hotel and Strategic Hotels & Resorts. It is still waiting for regulatory approval to buy US life insurer Fidelity & Guaranty Life for US$1.6 billion.
The same imbalances can be seen in sectors such as automobiles, payment cards and technology.
China’s Geely Holding Group (吉利控股集團) bought Volvo Cars Corp from Ford Motor Co in 2010, but foreign companies are required to set up joint ventures to assemble vehicles in China, often transferring technology in the process.
While China UnionPay (中國銀聯) cards have grown to become the world’s No. 1 in terms of number of cards issued, US credit-card operators Visa Inc and MasterCard Inc have yet to be independently licensed to clear transactions in China, despite a 2012 WTO ruling mandating that Beijing open the sector.
Foreign technology hardware and service providers are bristling at requirements to meet the restrictive terms of newly minted cybersecurity regulations.
Beijing’s “Made in China 2025” plan also calls for a progressive increase in domestic parts used in priority sectors, such as advanced information technology and robotics to 70 percent by 2025.
The idea of some form of reciprocity is gaining traction, particularly in combating “techno-nationalism,” APCO Worldwide greater China region chairman James McGregor said.
“You’ve got Chinese companies that have protected markets and make loads of money and then they are going out and doing international acquisitions that could destroy other companies,” he said. “Now China has overreached so much they have alienated much of the business community.”
US policymakers had to figure out how to use the US’ openness and rule of law to deal with China, instead of allowing them to become vulnerabilities, McGregor said.
The question is how to craft a reciprocity policy without destabilizing bilateral relations or triggering a retaliatory backlash against US businesses in China.
Chinese state media outlets have warned that US businesses could be targets in any trade war that Trump might unleash — he has threatened to label China a currency manipulator and slap heavy tariffs on Chinese goods.
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce did not respond to a request for comment on the issue of reciprocity.
However, Tu Xinquan (屠新泉), a trade expert at Beijing’s University of International Business and Economics, said Trump’s options would be limited by his promises to create jobs.
“If you close the door to Chinese investments, that’s not good for American employment,” Tu said.
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
MAJOR DROP: CEO Tim Cook, who is visiting Hanoi, pledged the firm was committed to Vietnam after its smartphone shipments declined 9.6% annually in the first quarter Apple Inc yesterday said it would increase spending on suppliers in Vietnam, a key production hub, as CEO Tim Cook arrived in the country for a two-day visit. The iPhone maker announced the news in a statement on its Web site, but gave no details of how much it would spend or where the money would go. Cook is expected to meet programmers, content creators and students during his visit, online newspaper VnExpress reported. The visit comes as US President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to ramp up Vietnam’s role in the global tech supply chain to reduce the US’ dependence on China. Images on
New apartments in Taiwan’s major cities are getting smaller, while old apartments are increasingly occupied by older people, many of whom live alone, government data showed. The phenomenon has to do with sharpening unaffordable property prices and an aging population, property brokers said. Apartments with one bedroom that are two years old or older have gained a noticeable presence in the nation’s six special municipalities as well as Hsinchu county and city in the past five years, Evertrust Rehouse Co (永慶房產集團) found, citing data from the government’s real-price transaction platform. In Taipei, apartments with one bedroom accounted for 19 percent of deals last
US CONSCULTANT: The US Department of Commerce’s Ursula Burns is a rarely seen US government consultant to be put forward to sit on the board, nominated as an independent director Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, yesterday nominated 10 candidates for its new board of directors, including Ursula Burns from the US Department of Commerce. It is rare that TSMC has nominated a US government consultant to sit on its board. Burns was nominated as one of seven independent directors. She is vice chair of the department’s Advisory Council on Supply Chain Competitiveness. Burns is to stand for election at TSMC’s annual shareholders’ meeting on June 4 along with the rest of the candidates. TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) was not on the list after in December last