Handing out multibillion-dollar fines right and left to domestic and foreign financial giants, the US has taken on the role of the unforgiving global cop of the business world.
In stark contrast to the relative inertia of white-collar law enforcement in Europe, Washington most recently brought the hammer down on Deutsche Bank AG and Credit Suisse Group AG, which sold junk-filled, mortgage-backed securities ahead of the 2008 financial meltdown.
Deutsche Bank has agreed to a payout of US$7.2 billion, while Credit Suisse settled for US$5.3 billion to resolve US authorities’ allegations and avoid the lengthy headache of a trial.
Instead of dragging financial firms to court, the US has taken them to the cashier.
US giants have not been spared: JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp collectively have shelled out US$40 billion to settle cases linked to toxic, crisis-era financial products.
“There’s a kind of fundamentalism to US law,” said Nicolas Veron, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel and the Washington-based Peterson Institute. “If you break the law, punishment comes down.”
To be sure, British authorities have taken action over the LIBOR interest rate manipulation scandal, but such retribution remains rare in the rest of Europe.
“It isn’t so much a difference in the rules as in the manner in which they are applied. Things are much more severe in the United States,” Veron said, adding that European countries “do not dare” punish their national flagship companies.
The US legal framework nevertheless offers the country the means to extend the long arm of the law well beyond its borders.
In the most recent cases, the US imposed US$2.6 billion in criminal penalties on the Brazilian construction conglomerate Odebrecht SA — most of which will be paid to Brazil — and a half billion on the Israeli generic drugmaker Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Both matters involved corruption occurring outside the US.
The US pioneered the prosecution of such foreign bribery cases, adopting the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in 1977 in the wake of the Watergate scandal, which allows US officials to hunt down corrupt payments abroad when the companies involved are traded on Wall Street or are otherwise exposed to US jurisdiction.
In the decades since, member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development have adopted similar laws but do not enforce them with the same vigor or frequency.
Given the means and opportunity to apply its laws “extraterritorially” with such regularity, the US has become a kind of worldwide anticorruption police force, and buttressed its geopolitical influence.
“There’s a real nexus between economics and foreign affairs,” said Aaron Klein, head of the center on regulation and markets at the Brookings Institution in Washington. “The next war is more likely to be fought with bonds than with bombs.”
In a different kind of case, Volkswagen’s sprawling emissions-cheating scandal also has shown the might of the US legal system and its ability to bring major companies to task.
To compensate drivers and repair damage to the environment, the giant German automaker has agreed to pay out more than US$15 billion so far, and doubtless will have to pay more before putting the scandal behind it. Nonetheless, the company could still face criminal charges.
In Europe, authorities have also opened investigations into Volkswagen, but by their own admission, the results will be much less spectacular.
“In the European Union, the way to damages is more complicated than in the United States,” EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourova said in September.
In the US, authorities can be supported in their actions by so-called class-action lawsuits brought collectively by groups of private individuals who have been wronged, which can ratchet up pressure on companies — but this option does exist in Europe.
Meanwhile, European authorities have not been completely dormant in dealing with major companies. They have opened numerous anti-trust investigations and intensified their pursuit of tax avoidance and evasion by multinational companies.
Making perhaps its biggest splash to date, the European Commission at the end of August directed iPhone maker Apple Inc to pay 13 billion euros (US$13.5 billion) in back taxes to Ireland, drawing the ire of a sizable player: the US.
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
MAJOR DROP: CEO Tim Cook, who is visiting Hanoi, pledged the firm was committed to Vietnam after its smartphone shipments declined 9.6% annually in the first quarter Apple Inc yesterday said it would increase spending on suppliers in Vietnam, a key production hub, as CEO Tim Cook arrived in the country for a two-day visit. The iPhone maker announced the news in a statement on its Web site, but gave no details of how much it would spend or where the money would go. Cook is expected to meet programmers, content creators and students during his visit, online newspaper VnExpress reported. The visit comes as US President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to ramp up Vietnam’s role in the global tech supply chain to reduce the US’ dependence on China. Images on
New apartments in Taiwan’s major cities are getting smaller, while old apartments are increasingly occupied by older people, many of whom live alone, government data showed. The phenomenon has to do with sharpening unaffordable property prices and an aging population, property brokers said. Apartments with one bedroom that are two years old or older have gained a noticeable presence in the nation’s six special municipalities as well as Hsinchu county and city in the past five years, Evertrust Rehouse Co (永慶房產集團) found, citing data from the government’s real-price transaction platform. In Taipei, apartments with one bedroom accounted for 19 percent of deals last
US CONSCULTANT: The US Department of Commerce’s Ursula Burns is a rarely seen US government consultant to be put forward to sit on the board, nominated as an independent director Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, yesterday nominated 10 candidates for its new board of directors, including Ursula Burns from the US Department of Commerce. It is rare that TSMC has nominated a US government consultant to sit on its board. Burns was nominated as one of seven independent directors. She is vice chair of the department’s Advisory Council on Supply Chain Competitiveness. Burns is to stand for election at TSMC’s annual shareholders’ meeting on June 4 along with the rest of the candidates. TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) was not on the list after in December last