Former South Korean teacher Kim Jeong-min was at Tokyo’s Narita International Airport this month when he watched a TV news report that Samsung Electronics Co’s Galaxy Note 7 smartphone was banned on airplanes because it was prone to catching fire.
Kim, 58, said he had felt humiliated, as if the non-South Koreans in the airport lounge were looking at him.
Although he does not own a Galaxy Note 7, his reaction was typical of the intense feelings South Koreans hold toward Samsung, the most dramatic corporate success story to emerge from the country’s transformation from a war-torn agrarian nation to a global economic powerhouse.
Photo: Bloomberg
“Whether we like it or not, Samsung is to the global market what our national team is in the Olympics,” Kim said.
Calling Samsung the country’s biggest and most profitable company hardly describes its special — but not always favorable — place in minds there.
Some South Koreans say they live in the “republic of Samsung.”
Life can literally begin and end with Samsung: One can be born in a Samsung hospital, attend a Samsung university, honeymoon in a Samsung hotel, stock a Samsung-built apartment with Samsung appliances bought with a Samsung credit card, take children to Samsung amusement parks and have one’s body, upon death, taken to a Samsung funeral center.
For South Koreans, the company’s progression from an assembler of clunky transistor radio sets to the world’s leading producer of flat-panel TV sets, computer chips and smartphones is a source of national pride.
Last year, Samsung accounted for 20 percent of South Korea’s US$527 billion in exports. That pride was dented, and economic unease deepened, when Samsung recalled more than 3 million Note 7 smartphones globally and decided not to produce any more, because some devices heated up and burst into flames.
“This is not just Samsung’s trouble. It’s trouble for the entire economy,” said Moon Jae-in, leader of South Korea’s opposition and a potential contender in next year’s presidential election, referring to the Note 7 crisis. “Because people take pride in Samsung as a brand representing South Korea, it is their trouble, too.”
On Thursday last week, South Korean President Park Geun-hye voiced concern about the Galaxy Note 7 recall’s impact on exports.
The economy has taken recent hits from rising unemployment rates and the bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping Co. Its shipyards, among the world’s largest, are laying off thousands of people after posting huge losses because of shrinking orders and competition from lower-cost rivals in China.
Samsung is the best-known brand name South Korea has ever produced, ranking seventh in the 100 best global brands compiled by brand consultancy Interbrand. Its Galaxy smartphones have lifted its — and by extension South Korea’s — high-tech image more than any other South Korean product.
Having overtaken Sony Corp and other Japanese companies it once mimicked, Samsung has grown powerful enough to challenge Apple Inc, an icon of US innovation.
To many South Koreans, the Note 7 recall, the biggest ever in the mobile phone industry, is just another painful lesson for Samsung to learn from and pay for — the recall is estimated to cost it US$6.2 billion — in its quest to dominate yet another industry.
“All manufacturing companies, including the American and Japanese, make mistakes,” said Park Bo-yeon, 29, who was recently browsing in a handset shop in downtown Seoul where a notice urged customers to trade in Note 7s. “What matters is whether you can learn from them and move on. Samsung always has.”
Park said that the Note 7 fiasco had been overblown by the US news media, which she said looked down on Samsung.
She said she was disappointed that Samsung had failed to explain why some Note 7s heated up and caught fire.
However, she was equally impressed by Samsung’s “courageous decision to terminate the Note 7 before anyone died.”
However, among South Koreans the name Samsung also evokes greed and secrecy. They often describe the company as a predator that makes profits not so much through innovation, but by ruthlessly squeezing its numerous domestic parts suppliers.
And Samsung has never shaken off its image as an imitator, although a highly efficient one.
Last year, it was ordered to pay US$548 million in damages to Apple for infringing on iPhone design patents, a case that is now at the US Supreme Court.
The Note 7 disaster raised more doubts about Samsung’s reputation. It also reminded South Koreans that their export-driven economy depended so heavily on Samsung and a handful of other chaebol, or family-controlled conglomerates, that they often feel it is held hostage to them.
“The saying that Samsung’s good and bad luck is our country’s good and bad luck is propaganda manufactured by Samsung and media and politicians beholden to it,” said Kim Sang-gyun, 32, who was visiting the same shop as Park. “Why should I worry about Samsung’s trouble unless I owned a Samsung share or Note 7? And I don’t.”
Samsung is the most successful among the chaebol, which spearheaded South Korea’s industrialization by copying foreign competitors’ products, but making them cheaper, better and faster.
China is now using the same “fast follower” strategy to threaten South Korea in the industries it has dominated: shipbuilding, semiconductors and smartphones.
South Korea sees itself as in a constant race to catch up with innovators like Apple while struggling to keep a step ahead of Chinese rivals.
The Note 7 humiliation left many South Koreans wondering whether Samsung — and South Korea in general — is stumbling in that race.
“They say Samsung is the strongest among our country’s businesses,” Kim Jeong-min said. “That’s why its Note 7 failure worries me. It kind of shows our limit.”
Among the rows of vibrators, rubber torsos and leather harnesses at a Chinese sex toys exhibition in Shanghai this weekend, the beginnings of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven shift in the industry quietly pulsed. China manufactures about 70 percent of the world’s sex toys, most of it the “hardware” on display at the fair — whether that be technicolor tentacled dildos or hyper-realistic personalized silicone dolls. Yet smart toys have been rising in popularity for some time. Many major European and US brands already offer tech-enhanced products that can enable long-distance love, monitor well-being and even bring people one step closer to
Malaysia’s leader yesterday announced plans to build a massive semiconductor design park, aiming to boost the Southeast Asian nation’s role in the global chip industry. A prominent player in the semiconductor industry for decades, Malaysia accounts for an estimated 13 percent of global back-end manufacturing, according to German tech giant Bosch. Now it wants to go beyond production and emerge as a chip design powerhouse too, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. “I am pleased to announce the largest IC (integrated circuit) Design Park in Southeast Asia, that will house world-class anchor tenants and collaborate with global companies such as Arm [Holdings PLC],”
Sales in the retail, and food and beverage sectors last month continued to rise, increasing 0.7 percent and 13.6 percent respectively from a year earlier, setting record highs for the month of March, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said yesterday. Sales in the wholesale sector also grew last month by 4.6 annually, mainly due to the business opportunities for emerging applications related to artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing technologies, the ministry said in a report. The ministry forecast that retail, and food and beverage sales this month would retain their growth momentum as the former would benefit from Tomb Sweeping Day
Thousands of parents in Singapore are furious after a Cordlife Group Ltd (康盛人生集團), a major operator of cord blood banks in Asia, irreparably damaged their children’s samples through improper handling, with some now pursuing legal action. The ongoing case, one of the worst to hit the largely untested industry, has renewed concerns over companies marketing themselves to anxious parents with mostly unproven assurances. This has implications across the region, given Cordlife’s operations in Hong Kong, Macau, Indonesia, the Philippines and India. The parents paid for years to have their infants’ cord blood stored, with the understanding that the stem cells they contained