As the Chinese economy stumbles, wealthy families are increasingly trying to move large sums of money out of the country, worried that the value of the currency will fall and their savings will be worth less.
To get around the country’s cash controls, individuals are asking friends or family members to carry or transfer out US$50,000 apiece, the annual legal limit in China. A group of 100 people can move US$5 million overseas.
The practice is called “smurfing,” named after the blue, mushroom-dwelling cartoon characters, and it is part of an exodus of capital that is casting doubt on China’s economic prospects and shaking global markets.
Over the last year, companies and individuals have moved nearly US$1 trillion from China.
Some methods are perfectly legal, like investing in real estate elsewhere, buying businesses overseas and paying off debts owed in US dollars.
Others, like smurfing, are more dubious, and in certain cases, outright illegal. Chinese customs officials last year caught a woman trying to leave the country with US$250,000 strapped to her chest and thighs and hidden inside her shoes.
If the government cannot keep citizens from rushing to the financial exits, China’s outlook could darken. The swell of outflows is a destabilizing force in China’s slowing economy, threatening to undermine confidence and hurt a banking system that is struggling to deal with a decade-long lending binge.
The capital flight is already putting significant pressure on the yuan. The government is trying to prevent a free fall in the currency by stepping into the markets and tapping its huge cash hoard to shore up the yuan. However, a deep erosion of those reserves might set off further outflows and create turbulence in the markets.
China is also trying to put the brakes on outflows by tightening its grip on the country’s links to the global financial system. For example, the government just started to clamp down on people’s use of bank cards to buy overseas life insurance policies.
Such moves have trade-offs. The limits create concerns that the government is pulling back on reform efforts that China needs to keep growth humming in the decades to come. However, the near-term pressure also requires serious attention, given the global shock waves.
“The currency has become a very near-term threat to financial stability,” Autonomous Research economist Charlene Chu (朱夏蓮) said.
Navigating such problems is fairly new for China.
For years, China soaked up much of the world’s investment money, as the economy grew at annual rates in the double digits. A largely closed financial system kept China’s own money corralled inside the country.
Now, with growth slowing, money is gushing out of the country. And the government has a looser grip on the spigot, because China dismantled some currency restrictions to open up its economy in recent years.
“Companies don’t want renminbi and individuals don’t want renminbi,” China Market Research Group founder Shaun Rein (雷小山) said.
“The renminbi was a sure bet for a long time, but now that it’s not, a lot of people want to get out,” Rein added.
The government has been cutting interest rates to stimulate the economy, making it less attractive for savers to keep their money in the country. Corporate profits are shrinking, because China has too many spare steel mills, car factories and empty houses, leading investors to seek better returns elsewhere.
Ronald Wan (溫天納), a Hong Kong money manager who is on the boards of numerous state-owned enterprises in China, said that pessimism was becoming the consensus.
“Among the companies I have been in contact with, all of them have the intention of moving money out of the country,” he said.
Individuals are allowed to move US$50,000 per year across China’s borders. Companies and sophisticated investors have more freedom to send out money legally for big-ticket purchases and overseas investments.
Overseas and domestic companies, which maintain bank accounts in various currencies, can also shift their cash, as well as borrow based on which currency they think will fall in value.
However, unofficial methods abound.
Companies have inflated trade invoices to keep more profits outside the country, although Chinese authorities have cracked down on the practice.
Rein described doing market research with a wealthy woman in Shanghai who changed US$7 million this winter from yuan into dollars by using 140 relatives, friends and even friends’ relatives, who each carried US$50,000 apiece.
However, the government is trying to cut off some routes.
Two years ago, the government gave permission for insurers to invest 15 percent of their assets overseas, up from 1.5 percent. However, China abruptly told insurers this winter to suspend many of their overseas plans, according to Hong Kong financiers.
Beijing has restricted yuan withdrawals from overseas branches of Chinese banks. In Shenzhen, banks have begun requiring that residents make reservations up to a week in advance if they want to change the daily maximum of US$10,000 worth of yuan into dollars.
Last month, Zou Tai, a hospital worker from east central China, caught an early morning flight to buy a US$50,000 life insurance policy in Hong Kong. Scores of Chinese customers have been doing the same to get money out of the country, since the policy is bought in yuan and can be cashed out in US dollars.
“The buying power of the renminbi keeps dropping,” Zou said.
“I feel that China’s leaders will have no choice, but to devalue the renminbi,” Zou added.
Zou acted in the nick of time, because the government is now pushing back.
UnionPay International (銀聯國際), a government-controlled bank card company, recently announced that it would start strictly enforcing a pre-existing, but widely ignored limit on overseas insurance purchases of US$5,000 per year per card.
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
MAJOR DROP: CEO Tim Cook, who is visiting Hanoi, pledged the firm was committed to Vietnam after its smartphone shipments declined 9.6% annually in the first quarter Apple Inc yesterday said it would increase spending on suppliers in Vietnam, a key production hub, as CEO Tim Cook arrived in the country for a two-day visit. The iPhone maker announced the news in a statement on its Web site, but gave no details of how much it would spend or where the money would go. Cook is expected to meet programmers, content creators and students during his visit, online newspaper VnExpress reported. The visit comes as US President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to ramp up Vietnam’s role in the global tech supply chain to reduce the US’ dependence on China. Images on
New apartments in Taiwan’s major cities are getting smaller, while old apartments are increasingly occupied by older people, many of whom live alone, government data showed. The phenomenon has to do with sharpening unaffordable property prices and an aging population, property brokers said. Apartments with one bedroom that are two years old or older have gained a noticeable presence in the nation’s six special municipalities as well as Hsinchu county and city in the past five years, Evertrust Rehouse Co (永慶房產集團) found, citing data from the government’s real-price transaction platform. In Taipei, apartments with one bedroom accounted for 19 percent of deals last
US CONSCULTANT: The US Department of Commerce’s Ursula Burns is a rarely seen US government consultant to be put forward to sit on the board, nominated as an independent director Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, yesterday nominated 10 candidates for its new board of directors, including Ursula Burns from the US Department of Commerce. It is rare that TSMC has nominated a US government consultant to sit on its board. Burns was nominated as one of seven independent directors. She is vice chair of the department’s Advisory Council on Supply Chain Competitiveness. Burns is to stand for election at TSMC’s annual shareholders’ meeting on June 4 along with the rest of the candidates. TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) was not on the list after in December last