Perhaps everything is bigger in the US, as the old saw goes, but when it comes to mobile phone calls and data usage, US consumers are certainly paying big, sometimes nearly as much 20 times as Europeans.
If you live in France, you can pay as little as 20 euros (US$21.54) per month for a monthly package featuring 50 gigabytes (GB) of data, unlimited domestic and international calls to more than 100 countries and unlimited text messages.
In the US, that much data could cost you US$390 per month from one national operator.
While the above comparison might be the extreme, it dovetails with an International Telecommunications Union report last year that found US data to be up to 19.5 times more expensive than in Europe when corrected for purchasing power of consumers.
The result is that while US companies might be the pioneers with online video streaming services like Netflix and Hulu, users in the US have been asked to pay much more for what it takes to use them on a smartphone, which is rapidly becoming a popular platform for catching the latest episode of your TV show.
However, that might be changing, as another US operator recently dropped its unlimited calls and data package from US$180 to US$80 per month.
So why has there been such a huge difference?
“The fundamental reason is competition,” said Steven Hartley, practice leader for Service Providers and Markets at telecoms and IT consultancy Ovum Ltd.
France and Britain — where you can get an unlimited data plan for as little as £27 (US$41.13) — each have four national mobile operators. The same goes for Sweden, where the cheapest 50GB plan is roughly US$46.
Meanwhile in the US, the handful of so-called national operators do not really fully cover all of the country. At any given location only one or two might be present, plus a small regional player.
“Of course, where you have less choice you are going to have higher prices,” Hartley said.
The situation is in some ways ironic, given that the US is generally seen as the paragon of free competition, which is supposed to lead to lower prices, while the EU ties companies up in red tape, thus causing higher prices.
However, in this case “the EU has gone out of its way to encourage more competition and to regulate prices, and to regulate them down,” which has benefited consumers, Hartley said.
Sylvain Chevallier, an associate at consultancy BearingPoint, which specializes in telecom, agreed that competition is the issue, but believes the problem is in Europe.
“It’s not that the US market isn’t competitive, but I would say that in fact the European market is way too competitive,” which has resulted in plunging prices, he said.
Companies need a certain number of subscribers to cover their costs of building and operating their networks, he said.
In the US, “you don’t have this constant life or death struggle for a sufficient number of customers,” Chevallier said, calling it a “competitive, but reasonable market.”
However, he believes that in certain European markets, such as France, there are too many operators for the number of customers, noting that revenue per customer fell by nearly one-third when a fourth operator started business.
“To survive, the operators must get as many clients as possible, but to do so cut prices,” Chevallier said. “It’s a hellish circle that results in the market losing its value.”
While Europeans might enjoy low prices now, the question will be whether operators will be willing to invest the massive sums needed to upgrade and expand their networks.
Indeed, the need to recoup investment costs is the main argument advanced by the US mobile industry to explain its tariffs.
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
MAJOR DROP: CEO Tim Cook, who is visiting Hanoi, pledged the firm was committed to Vietnam after its smartphone shipments declined 9.6% annually in the first quarter Apple Inc yesterday said it would increase spending on suppliers in Vietnam, a key production hub, as CEO Tim Cook arrived in the country for a two-day visit. The iPhone maker announced the news in a statement on its Web site, but gave no details of how much it would spend or where the money would go. Cook is expected to meet programmers, content creators and students during his visit, online newspaper VnExpress reported. The visit comes as US President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to ramp up Vietnam’s role in the global tech supply chain to reduce the US’ dependence on China. Images on
New apartments in Taiwan’s major cities are getting smaller, while old apartments are increasingly occupied by older people, many of whom live alone, government data showed. The phenomenon has to do with sharpening unaffordable property prices and an aging population, property brokers said. Apartments with one bedroom that are two years old or older have gained a noticeable presence in the nation’s six special municipalities as well as Hsinchu county and city in the past five years, Evertrust Rehouse Co (永慶房產集團) found, citing data from the government’s real-price transaction platform. In Taipei, apartments with one bedroom accounted for 19 percent of deals last
US CONSCULTANT: The US Department of Commerce’s Ursula Burns is a rarely seen US government consultant to be put forward to sit on the board, nominated as an independent director Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, yesterday nominated 10 candidates for its new board of directors, including Ursula Burns from the US Department of Commerce. It is rare that TSMC has nominated a US government consultant to sit on its board. Burns was nominated as one of seven independent directors. She is vice chair of the department’s Advisory Council on Supply Chain Competitiveness. Burns is to stand for election at TSMC’s annual shareholders’ meeting on June 4 along with the rest of the candidates. TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) was not on the list after in December last