Sun, Feb 23, 2014 - Page 13 News List

US Federal Reserve was after more control in 2008

‘WHAT ABOUT US?’:The Fed discussed the problem of discipline among banks during the financial crisis four years ago, which prompted reformation of the law


US central bankers thought they should get more regulatory powers in return for providing cheap cash to Wall Street banks during the 2008 credit crisis, according to US Federal Reserve transcripts released on Friday.

Powerful investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had access to a raft of measures that allowed them to prop up markets during the 2008 credit meltdown, but the Fed had little say over them.

“I am just a little worried about being taken advantage of here,” Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard Fisher said in a March 2008 conference call of the Fed’s policysetting Federal Open Market Committee.

“The question is: What do we get in return, and how do we make sure that, since we are not the regulator of these dealers, there is indeed discipline?” the transcripts show Fisher as saying.

That concern foreshadowed later efforts to do away with the expectation that the fear of a financial meltdown would force governments to always stand behind banks in a crisis, something that Wall Street critics say can encourage reckless behavior.

The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law prohibits bailouts that are funded by taxpayers of “too-big-to-fail” banks, but some politicians have pushed for further measures to ensure there is not a repeat of the crisis-era bailouts.

The Fed, which is still dealing with fallout from the crisis and the 2007 to 2009 recession, released transcripts of its committee meetings in 2008 on Friday after the typical five-year lag.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission oversaw the securities activities of the biggest investment banks in 2008, and only monitored the parent companies through a voluntary system known as the “consolidated supervised entities” program.

While Wall Street investment banks were not regulated by the Fed, they could participate in the central bank’s emergency measures to provide them with more collateral and to prop up short-term lending and prevent a further spreading of panic.

“My concern is that the safety-and-soundness disciplines that we apply don’t appear to be applied to these broker-dealers,” Fisher said at the March 2008 meeting.

During that year, the independent investment banks all succumbed to the crisis in rapid succession. Bear Stearns was rescued by JPMorgan in March, while Lehman Brothers went bankrupt in September, setting off a global panic.

Also that month, Merrill Lynch was bought by Bank of America, while Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs changed their legal statuses to become bank holding companies, which put them under the Fed’s oversight.

In the months leading up to the Lehman bankruptcy, the Fed and the commission signed an agreement to share information on supervising the broker-dealers, but some policymakers were already saying more was needed.

Some also were worried about the increased concentration of the US financial industry, as several players fell away or were gobbled up by larger banks, saying this added to the too-big-to-fail problem.

The Dodd-Frank law cracks down on big banks through tough capital and liquidity standards and gives the Fed greater power over the largest financial firms.

The law also requires them to craft plans, known as living wills, showing how they could go through bankruptcy rather than being bailed out in a crisis.

This story has been viewed 1438 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top