Apple Inc will not release a large-screened “phablet” phone to compete with arch-rival Samsung this year, according to analysts, as the odds narrow that the technology group will release a cheaper iPhone to capture the pay-as-you-go market.
Speculation over Apple’s next big move is rife as a number of potential candidates — such as Apple TV or the iWatch — have fallen by the wayside.
Last month, the company announced a US$55 billion share buyback, which bought it breathing space from investors. It is now expected to take a less radical development route by focusing on a cheaper, rather than larger iPhone.
“The odds this year of a larger iPhone are zero,” Strategy Analytics executive director Neil Mawston said.
Describing the new product as the iPhone 5S, he added: “That’s what we’re hearing from our supply chain sources in the Far East. It seems the iPhone 5S will be pretty similar to the iPhone 5.”
About 25 million “phablets” — defined as smartphones with screens of more than 5 inch diagonal length — were sold last year, according to IHS iSuppli, which forecasts that sales will hit 60 million this year amid strong demand for Samsung’s Galaxy Note. That compares to forecasts of total smartphone sales of 908 million this year.
However, there is growing expectation that Apple will offer a cheaper iPhone to attract new buyers unable to afford the top-end devices.
Canalys chief executive Steve Brazier says Apple would benefit by offering phones in different designs and colors — as it did with the second generation of its best-selling iMac desktop computers in 1999.
“Why should business people carry the same phone as teenagers?” Brazier asks. “Kids don’t want the same phone as their dads.”
With the smartphone market growing less rapidly than it was, analysts also question whether there is enough demand for a high-end Apple phone as prices are driven down by cheaper models using Google’s Android operating system — Samsung’s main platform.
The Chinese market has taken over from the US as the world’s largest and is the main growth area.
However, most of its buyers are opting for cheaper phones, and the iPhone’s data system is not yet compatible with China Mobile, which has more than 700 million subscribers.
Yet even a fast-selling “cheap iPhone” would not have a dramatic effect on Apple’s gigantic revenues and profits, according to estimates by Benedict Evans, a telecoms specialist at Enders Analysis.
In a note to clients seen by the Guardian, he calculates that a phone priced at US$200 which sold 40 million in a quarter — in effect doubling Apple’s phone sales — would generate US$8 billion of revenue and US$2.4 billion in profit.
That though would only raise first quarter revenues by 8 percent, and profits by 4.5 percent.
“In other words, a blockbuster new Apple phone that almost doubles unit sales and blows a hole in the middle of the Android market might only add 5 percent to Apple’s gross profits,” he said.
While Apple has stayed silent on its plans, and declined to comment for this article, analysts see change to its product line as inevitable.
“They have been slow to react to the fact that the market has changed. It gives them a huge advantage in economies of scale to build just one model, but they could have four or five. Look at the Mac [computer range] — they have those in all sorts of different sizes and shapes and configurations,” Brazier said.
Horace Dediu, who runs the Asymco consultancy, reckoned Apple was more likely to offer a US$100 or US$150 phone — to minimize “cannibalization” of its top-end range.
“Apple is happy to expand its portfolio in the Mac, iPod and iPad. Why should the iPhone be exempt?” he said.
Apple’s strategy may be glimpsed at its Worldwide Developer Conference in San Francisco next month, when it will unveil the look and feel of the next generation of its iPhone and iPad software, iOS 7 — said to be codenamed “Innsbruck” inside the company.
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
Nanya Technology Corp (南亞科技) yesterday said the DRAM supply crunch could extend through 2028, as the artificial intelligence (AI) boom has led the world’s major memory makers to dramatically reduce production of standard DRAM and allocate a significant portion of their capacity for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips. The most severe supply constraints would stretch to the first half of next year due to “very limited” increases in new DRAM capacity worldwide, Nanya Technology president Lee Pei-ing (李培瑛) told a news briefing. The company plans to increase monthly 12-inch wafer capacity to 20,000 in the first half of 2028 after a
Taiwan has enough crude oil reserves for more than 100 days and sufficient natural gas reserves for more than 11 days, both above the regulatory safety requirement, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday, adding that the government would prioritize domestic price stability as conflicts in the Middle East continue. Overall, energy supply for this month is secure, and the government is continuing efforts to ensure sufficient supply for next month, Kung told reporters after meeting with representatives from business groups at the ministry in Taipei. The ministry has been holding daily cross-ministry meetings at the Executive Yuan to ensure
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI