Just a month ahead of what promises to be a very difficult summit on the EU’s 2014 to 2020 budget, leaders are trading threats and blandishments, seeking advantage where they can to trim their bill.
The man in the middle, EU President Herman Van Rompuy, called last week for the 27 member states to be ready to compromise, but with Britain and Denmark threatening a veto, that seems a lot to hope for just yet.
“I hope we can reach an accord in November,” Van Rompuy said.
“For that, we need something without which nothing is possible — a sense of compromise, alongside the political will to find an accord. If there is no willingness, then we will never get there,” he said.
In July, the European Commission proposed a budget of 1.03 trillion euros (US$1.33 trillion), up 5 percent on the 2007 to 2013 package, sparking howls of protest from the seven major contributor states and demands for a cut of 100 billion euros or more.
Germany, France and Britain especially insist that with government budgets under pressure from all sides, the EU cannot expect to get away with such a large increase in spending.
“We can’t have EU spending going up and up,” British Prime Minister David Cameron said at the EU summit on Oct 15 and Oct.16, threatening to veto any November accord which failed on that score.
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt took a similar line on Thursday, saying she would veto a budget which did not give Denmark a 1 billion kroner (US$174 million) rebate.
“Our key message to the other countries and what we are fighting for, is that we have to have a discount and that we do not wish to pay other rich countries’ rebates,” Thorning-Schmidt said, without naming her targets.
Denmark currently has no rebate on its EU budget contribution — but Britain does and will jealously guard it, as Cameron has stressed time and time again.
Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Austria have also all negotiated rebates of various kinds, arguing that they are paying much more than other countries into the EU and not getting enough back in return.
The European Parliament has got in on the act too.
“If Cameron can do it, then so can we,” said Hannes Swoboda, head of the Socialist group in the parliament, which has its own power of veto over the budget under the EU constitution.
Highlighting the potential for strife, the EU parliament on Tuesday rejected cuts demanded by some member states in the EU budget for next year, aiming to protect popular programs against shortfalls which disrupted them this year.
“To boost growth and jobs, parliament reversed [cuts] ... in areas that MEPs believe are vital to boost the economy, such as research, entrepreneurship and employment measures,” it said in a statement.
The European Commission set the budget for next year at 138 billion euros, up 6.8 percent, but France, Finland and Germany wanted it cut by 5 billion euros while London suggested even more.
Tuesday’s vote means the parliament and the European Council, which groups the member states’ political leaders, will now have to take up the budget for next year again to reconcile their differences.
If they cannot do that, then this year’s budget becomes the basis for next year with an increase capped at about 2 percent, and the same formula would be applied in 2014 if no accord is reached.
Most want to avoid that outcome because it would mean no change to their contributions nor, just as important, to the balance of spending — about 40 percent on agriculture and about the same on social cohesion funds.
That could form the groundwork for compromise after all and significantly, EU sources said on Thursday that the Cypriot EU presidency was looking at a cut of 40 billion euros in the 2014 to 2020 budget.
Such a reduction would trim the budget back to about 1 percent of EU GDP, compared with the commission’s plan at 1.08 percent.
Germany, Europe’s paymaster and its strongest economy, reportedly favors a level about 1 percent.
However, one step forward, one step backwards.
“All areas will be covered by the cuts,” one of the sources said — including the British rebate.
Stephen Garrett, a 27-year-old graduate student, always thought he would study in China, but first the country’s restrictive COVID-19 policies made it nearly impossible and now he has other concerns. The cost is one deterrent, but Garrett is more worried about restrictions on academic freedom and the personal risk of being stranded in China. He is not alone. Only about 700 American students are studying at Chinese universities, down from a peak of nearly 25,000 a decade ago, while there are nearly 300,000 Chinese students at US schools. Some young Americans are discouraged from investing their time in China by what they see
Taiwan Transport and Storage Corp (TTS, 台灣通運倉儲) yesterday unveiled its first electric tractor unit — manufactured by Volvo Trucks — in a ceremony in Taipei, and said the unit would soon be used to transport cement produced by Taiwan Cement Corp (TCC, 台灣水泥). Both TTS and TCC belong to TCC International Holdings Ltd (台泥國際集團). With the electric tractor unit, the Taipei-based cement firm would become the first in Taiwan to use electric vehicles to transport construction materials. TTS chairman Koo Kung-yi (辜公怡), Volvo Trucks vice president of sales and marketing Johan Selven, TCC president Roman Cheng (程耀輝) and Taikoo Motors Group
MAJOR DROP: CEO Tim Cook, who is visiting Hanoi, pledged the firm was committed to Vietnam after its smartphone shipments declined 9.6% annually in the first quarter Apple Inc yesterday said it would increase spending on suppliers in Vietnam, a key production hub, as CEO Tim Cook arrived in the country for a two-day visit. The iPhone maker announced the news in a statement on its Web site, but gave no details of how much it would spend or where the money would go. Cook is expected to meet programmers, content creators and students during his visit, online newspaper VnExpress reported. The visit comes as US President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to ramp up Vietnam’s role in the global tech supply chain to reduce the US’ dependence on China. Images on
New apartments in Taiwan’s major cities are getting smaller, while old apartments are increasingly occupied by older people, many of whom live alone, government data showed. The phenomenon has to do with sharpening unaffordable property prices and an aging population, property brokers said. Apartments with one bedroom that are two years old or older have gained a noticeable presence in the nation’s six special municipalities as well as Hsinchu county and city in the past five years, Evertrust Rehouse Co (永慶房產集團) found, citing data from the government’s real-price transaction platform. In Taipei, apartments with one bedroom accounted for 19 percent of deals last