Just a month ahead of what promises to be a very difficult summit on the EU’s 2014 to 2020 budget, leaders are trading threats and blandishments, seeking advantage where they can to trim their bill.
The man in the middle, EU President Herman Van Rompuy, called last week for the 27 member states to be ready to compromise, but with Britain and Denmark threatening a veto, that seems a lot to hope for just yet.
“I hope we can reach an accord in November,” Van Rompuy said.
“For that, we need something without which nothing is possible — a sense of compromise, alongside the political will to find an accord. If there is no willingness, then we will never get there,” he said.
In July, the European Commission proposed a budget of 1.03 trillion euros (US$1.33 trillion), up 5 percent on the 2007 to 2013 package, sparking howls of protest from the seven major contributor states and demands for a cut of 100 billion euros or more.
Germany, France and Britain especially insist that with government budgets under pressure from all sides, the EU cannot expect to get away with such a large increase in spending.
“We can’t have EU spending going up and up,” British Prime Minister David Cameron said at the EU summit on Oct 15 and Oct.16, threatening to veto any November accord which failed on that score.
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt took a similar line on Thursday, saying she would veto a budget which did not give Denmark a 1 billion kroner (US$174 million) rebate.
“Our key message to the other countries and what we are fighting for, is that we have to have a discount and that we do not wish to pay other rich countries’ rebates,” Thorning-Schmidt said, without naming her targets.
Denmark currently has no rebate on its EU budget contribution — but Britain does and will jealously guard it, as Cameron has stressed time and time again.
Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Austria have also all negotiated rebates of various kinds, arguing that they are paying much more than other countries into the EU and not getting enough back in return.
The European Parliament has got in on the act too.
“If Cameron can do it, then so can we,” said Hannes Swoboda, head of the Socialist group in the parliament, which has its own power of veto over the budget under the EU constitution.
Highlighting the potential for strife, the EU parliament on Tuesday rejected cuts demanded by some member states in the EU budget for next year, aiming to protect popular programs against shortfalls which disrupted them this year.
“To boost growth and jobs, parliament reversed [cuts] ... in areas that MEPs believe are vital to boost the economy, such as research, entrepreneurship and employment measures,” it said in a statement.
The European Commission set the budget for next year at 138 billion euros, up 6.8 percent, but France, Finland and Germany wanted it cut by 5 billion euros while London suggested even more.
Tuesday’s vote means the parliament and the European Council, which groups the member states’ political leaders, will now have to take up the budget for next year again to reconcile their differences.
If they cannot do that, then this year’s budget becomes the basis for next year with an increase capped at about 2 percent, and the same formula would be applied in 2014 if no accord is reached.