Largan Precision Co (大立光), the nation’s leading maker of handset lenses, yesterday reported that its consolidated revenue hit a 23-month low of NT$978 million (US$32.72 million) last month, down 17.12 percent month-on-month and 28.39 percent year-on-year.
Last month’s sales were the lowest since July 2010, when it posted NT$1.05 billion in sales, as market demand remained weak because of continuing inventory adjustments by major customers.
Second-quarter revenue was NT$3.34 billion, down 8.3 percent from the previous quarter and down 17.93 percent compared with the previous year, company data showed.
The sequential decline of 8.3 percent was in line with a company forecast made last month.
During the company’s annual general meeting on June 18, Largan chief executive Adam Lin (林恩平) adjusted the firm’s second-quarter sales forecast from a sequential decline of more than 10 percent to a single-digit drop because of improved revenues.
Largan yesterday reiterated its optimistic outlook for the third quarter on the launch of new products. Lin told shareholders last month that the company would likely see gross margins rebound and that it would achieve record sales in the third quarter.
Accumulated revenue in the first six months totaled NT$6.98 billion, down 7.89 percent from the previous year.
Largan shares fell 0.66 percent to NT$602 yesterday. The share price has risen 6.36 percent so far this year, compared with a 4.46 percent increase on the TAIEX over the same period.
‘BIG LOSS’: This year might see the last generation of Huawei’s Kirin chips, as their production would stop next month because they are made using US technology Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co (華為) is running out of processor chips to make smartphones due to US sanctions and would be forced to stop production of its own most advanced chips, a company executive has said, in a sign of growing damage to Huawei’s business from US pressure. Huawei, one of the biggest producers of smartphones and network equipment, is at the center of US-Chinese tension over technology and security. Washington last year cut off Huawei’s access to US components and technology, and those penalties were tightened in May, when the White House barred vendors worldwide from using US
CORPORATE SCANDAL: Cathay Life has invested NT$13.3 billion in Bank Mayapada since 2015, but the latest loss of NT$8.8 billion has completely written off its investment Cathay Life Insurance Co (國泰人壽) yesterday said it would recognize an investment loss of NT$8.8 billion (US$298.1 million) in Indonesia’s Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk PT due to concerns about the lender’s operations amid a corporate scandal. The company said it would revise its earnings result for June, from a net profit of NT$6.52 billion to a net loss of NT$520 million, its first monthly loss over the past 17 months. After booking an investment loss of NT$5.2 billion in Bank Mayapada earlier this year, Cathay Life has so far recognized total investment losses of NT$14 billion in the lender, executive vice president
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reported that revenue last month expanded 25 percent annually, but fell 12.8 percent month-on-month to NT$105.96 billion (US$3.59 billion). In the first seven months of this year, the chipmaker’s revenue surged 33.6 percent to NT$727.26 billion, compared with NT$544.46 billion a year earlier. TSMC has said it aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year. The company has since May 15 stopped taking new orders from Huawei Technologies Co (華為), its second-biggest customer after Apple Inc, due to the US’ restrictions on exports containing US technologies. TSMC has no plans to
The US stock market has been on a tear, yet the country’s economy is in the dumps. So why do so many people believe — undoubtedly incorrectly — that the stock market has decoupled from reality? The economy many people experience, while bleak, is local, personal and, for the most part, either not publicly traded or plays only a small part in the stock market’s moves. To explain why these personal experiences have so little effect on equity markets, we must look more closely at the market role of the weakest industry sectors. The surprising conclusion: The most visible and economically vulnerable