Yang Long-san (楊榮山), Apple’s nemesis in a battle over the iPad trademark in China, once strutted the expo halls with dreams of market dominance. His company, Proview (唯冠), may now be in ruins and his most valuable asset a disputed trademark, but those dreams remain intact.
“My biggest wish is to resolve all these frustrating problems and put them behind me,” Yang said in a recent telephone interview. “If we can resolve all the problems we have now and I have a chance to make a comeback, I’d still want to overtake my old competitors.”
Much of that will depend on whether he wins a long-running dispute over ownership of the trademark in China — Apple’s second-biggest market by revenue. Although a recent decision by the Shanghai district court to reject Proview’s demands that Apple stop selling the iPad was a setback for Proview, the case is still to be heard in the higher court in Guangdong Province tomorrow.
A decision against Apple there would set a precedent that would create an uphill battle in other cases in lower courts around China. Local media have said Proview is seeking up to 10 billion yuan (US$1.6 billion) in compensation.
Proview’s fortunes may currently be the polar opposite of Apple — one has creditors at the door and the other is the world’s most valuable listed company — but both illustrate how the fickle world of technology can make or break a company.
Yang and Proview rode the first wave, when every home and office desk had to have a computer and a screen. For Apple, the last decade has seen it ride the crest of a new wave where the computer moved from a commoditized, clunky desktop to a fashionable mobile consumer device.
Proview may now be a shadow of a company, trying to convert its last major asset into cash, but it was not always so.
“They definitely existed,” said IHS analyst Rhoda Alexander, who covered the firm for a while. “They were a significant manufacturer and a major player.”
Yang and the late Apple CEO Steve Jobs were born just a year apart — Jobs in 1955, Yang a year later. An engineer by training, Yang worked in the electronics industry before founding Proview in 1989 in Taipei. At that time, a Jobs-less Apple was struggling for direction: That year it released the bulky, overpriced Macintosh Portable to underwhelming reviews.
Yang, meanwhile, was building a strong brand in the cutthroat computer display business: Within a decade of its founding, Proview had nearly 4 percent of the older-style cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor market and 12 percent of the newer, flat-screen LCD market.
This was the era of the desktop computer: In 1990, according to eTForecasts data, fewer than 22 million desktops were sold. By 2000, there were 98 million.
However, Yang’s plans were bigger.
While Proview had become a respected, albeit second or third-tier brand for computer monitors, he wanted more.
“He was very suave, very bright, very international,” an analyst who met him at a computer conference in the mid-1990s said. “He had an angle ... he knew everything about the world.”
iPAD LAUNCH
In 1997, Proview International Holdings Ltd (唯冠國際), the parent of units including Proview in Shenzhen and Taipei, became the first Taiwanese technology firm to list in Hong Kong; in 1999, it announced a deal with National Semiconductor Corp to build an Internet-access device it called the iPAD (Internet Personal Access Device).
It was really a stripped-down PC, with a bulky CRT monitor, a slow processor and running a very basic version of Microsoft Windows. Yang said in a recent interview that Proview had dedicated significant resources to develop its iPAD, whose design could later be found in Compaq’s now-defunct iPAQ Internet Device.
Yang was also busy building market share in monitors. In April 2000, Proview cut a deal with two smaller monitor makers, Mag Technology Co (MAG, 美格科技) and Chuntex Electronic Co (CTX, 中強電子), to share resources. In 2003, Proview announced a deal to build a range of display-oriented gadgets under the Motorola brand and, four years later, it teamed up with Taiwanese electronics giant Tatung Co (大同), which took a 16 percent stake in Hong Kong-listed Proview.
By then, the global financial crisis had hit.
In June 2008, Proview reported its first loss and was grappling for salvation. The Tatung deal, it said, “will significantly enhance the Group’s performance in the coming years.” The next year, there was no mention of the Tatung tie-up.
In September 2009, its Brazilian subsidiary filed for bankruptcy protection and Proview International was running into serious problems. Yang had in early 2008 transferred his about 30 percent stake to his son, and by late 2009 was lending his own money to the company.
When a company sought to buy the group’s iPAD trademarks, lawyers sold them on Dec. 23 for £35,000 (US$55,500).
Two weeks later, Proview stock, which had been languishing at about HK$0.25, doubled in a few days on heavy volume. The company was forced by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to say it was unaware of any reasons for the sudden interest.
On Jan. 27, Apple announced the iPad.
A week later, with Proview shares still trading heavily, the company conceded the truth of a report by Beijing Daily that China rights to the iPAD trademark were owned by its Shenzhen subsidiary. It was now clear Proview had sold trademarks to Apple — but not all of them.
With strong interest in the iPad ahead of its April launch, Proview was now sitting on something infinitely more valuable than any of its assets.
Now Yang was being pulled in all directions. Much of Proview’s debts were short-term, he said later, and the company had been defaulting on payments as early as December 2008. The Shenzhen subsidiary — the group’s largest operation — was hardest hit, leading to the local government corralling the banks it owed money to to support the company.
“Proview had a glorious past in Shenzhen and they wanted to see us survive the crisis,” Yang said. “But frankly, once the debt pile increased and suppliers got into trouble, the whole thing ballooned and that led to the factories closing down.”
By early 2010, the banks, too, were after whatever they could recover.
And creditors were not only going after his group’s assets in Shenzhen; a bankruptcy petition was filed against him personally in Hong Kong on March 4, 2010. Yang said creditors were only lending money to the company if he personally guaranteed the loans.
“We needed them to continue to support Proview,” he said.
In March 2010, Proview warned of a “significant loss” for the six months ending December 2009, which would be the last financial results announced. It then hired financial advisers to deal with creditors and come up with a restructuring plan, but the fate of the trademarks seemed to be the company’s focus.
Apple lawyers were firing off letters demanding Proview hand over the rest of the patents. By April, Proview was fending off reports that it was planning to auction the patents, dismissing one press article as “not accurate at all.”
ASSURANCES
In fact, it was not as clear-cut as that. The only assurances it had given Apple were that it would not sell them before April 30, a date it then pushed back to May 30, according to Hong Kong court documents. These also showed Proview Shenzhen was quietly trying to transfer the trademarks to a subsidiary, Yoke Technology (Shenzhen) Co (唯冠光電照明[深圳]).
However, time was running out. Legal proceedings by Chinese creditors to recover assets prompted the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to suspend trading in Proview shares on May 12.
Two days later, a Chinese court ordered Proview to sell off assets of another Chinese subsidiary, Ningbo Prowell Electronic Co (寧波昇銳電子). On May 20, Apple began legal action against Proview in Shenzhen.
The battle to save Proview International was lost.
By the middle of 2010, Yang had been forced to publicly concede that the bankruptcy proceedings against him were related to him loaning money to Proview; on Aug. 2, he lost the case and resigned from the board of Proview, whose shares were suspended.
The company was effectively moribund: About HK$3.83 billion (US$494 million) was overdue, while loans guaranteed by Yang himself amounted to HK$1.15 billion, according to company filings.
At its peak, Proview had employed 18,000 people and had offices across the world. Now, only a few hundred staff remained, mostly at the company’s plant in Wuhan, Hubei Province. Its Hong Kong headquarters is empty and its phone numbers no longer work. Only the factory in Wuhan continues to function. The plant in Shenzhen is a ghost town.
All activity centers on the trademark case.
Yang is quick to blame the financial crisis for his company’s downfall; many of his clients in the US went bust, he said, or were in dire financial straits. He points to Circuit City, which filed for bankruptcy in November 2008. However, analysts say many other companies rode the crisis.
Yang remains optimistic he can both win the case against Apple and rebuild his empire — but there are plenty of obstacles.
First, there’s his role: Although still, through his son, the controlling shareholder of the group, Yang is bankrupt in Hong Kong. A Hong Kong court has been critical of his role in the trademark dispute, saying he was an active participant in what the judge called a “conspiracy.”
Yang says that position as chairman of Proview Shenzhen is simply because “creditors in China didn’t want to deal with another person who is not familiar with the company.”
Beyond that, the relationship with Tatung, still a significant shareholder, seems to be on ice. Both Tatung directors resigned last year. Yang has engineered the removal of his successor, Elina Hui (許小玲), as chairman because, he says, “she did many things against the company’s principles.”
Proview has filed a lawsuit against her. It was not possible to reach Hui for comment. The company, which has yet to file annual reports for 2010 and last year, faces delisting in June if it cannot submit viable proposals for resuming business.
Yang is undeterred and convinced he can still take on his competitors. However, he does acknowledge he would do it differently now.
“Now that I think of it, it was a mistake to just blindly focus on expanding. I should have gone after profitability instead,” he said.
“I hope we can return to our glory days. I’m sure our shareholders are hoping for the same,” he said.
DECOUPLING? In a sign of deeper US-China technology decoupling, Apple has held initial talks about using Baidu’s generative AI technology in its iPhones, the Wall Street Journal said China has introduced guidelines to phase out US microprocessors from Intel Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) from government PCs and servers, the Financial Times reported yesterday. The procurement guidance also seeks to sideline Microsoft Corp’s Windows operating system and foreign-made database software in favor of domestic options, the report said. Chinese officials have begun following the guidelines, which were unveiled in December last year, the report said. They order government agencies above the township level to include criteria requiring “safe and reliable” processors and operating systems when making purchases, the newspaper said. The US has been aiming to boost domestic semiconductor
Nvidia Corp earned its US$2.2 trillion market cap by producing artificial intelligence (AI) chips that have become the lifeblood powering the new era of generative AI developers from start-ups to Microsoft Corp, OpenAI and Google parent Alphabet Inc. Almost as important to its hardware is the company’s nearly 20 years’ worth of computer code, which helps make competition with the company nearly impossible. More than 4 million global developers rely on Nvidia’s CUDA software platform to build AI and other apps. Now a coalition of tech companies that includes Qualcomm Inc, Google and Intel Corp plans to loosen Nvidia’s chokehold by going
OPENING ADDRESS: The CEO is to give a speech on the future of high-performance computing and artificial intelligence at the trade show’s opening on June 3, TAITRA said Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) chairperson and chief executive officer Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) is to deliver the opening keynote speech at Computex Taipei this year, the event’s organizer said in a statement yesterday. Su is to give a speech on the future of high-performance computing (HPC) in the artificial intelligence (AI) era to open Computex, one of the world’s largest computer and technology trade events, at 9:30am on June 3, the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) said. Su is to explore how AMD and the company’s strategic technology partners are pushing the limits of AI and HPC, from data centers to
ENERGY IMPACT: The electricity rate hike is expected to add about NT$4 billion to TSMC’s electricity bill a year and cut its annual earnings per share by about NT$0.154 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) has left its long-term gross margin target unchanged despite the government deciding on Friday to raise electricity rates. One of the heaviest power consuming manufacturers in Taiwan, TSMC said it always respects the government’s energy policy and would continue to operate its fabs by making efforts in energy conservation. The chipmaker said it has left a long-term goal of more than 53 percent in gross margin unchanged. The Ministry of Economic Affairs concluded a power rate evaluation meeting on Friday, announcing electricity tariffs would go up by 11 percent on average to about NT$3.4518 per kilowatt-hour (kWh)