Fri, Sep 02, 2011 - Page 10 News List

US government blocks AT&T purchase

NO GO:In its biggest antitrust challenge yet, the Obama administration said if AT&T bought T-Mobile USA it would be disastrous for consumers, and sued to stop the deal

Reuters, Washington and NEW YORK

T-Mobile USA and rival AT&T signage is displayed on cellphone stores in New York on Wednesday.

Photo: Bloomberg

The US government on Wednesday sued to block AT&T Inc’s US$39 billion purchase of T-Mobile USA, citing concerns it will harm competition in the wireless market and lead to higher prices.

The surprise move, which was the biggest antitrust challenge yet by the Obama administration, caught the carriers by surprise and, if successful, would end AT&T’s move to unseat Verizon Wireless as the No. 1 US mobile carrier.

If AT&T fails to defeat the Justice Department lawsuit, it will prove very costly — the No. 2 carrier would have to pay T-Mobile parent Deutsche Telekom an estimated US$6 billion in cash and other assets as part of the original deal.

The announcement is a slap in the face for AT&T chief executive Randall Stephenson, who was poised for a career-defining deal that would allow him to emerge from the shadow of predecessor and serial acquirer Ed Whitacre.

The court case could take months and cost millions of dollars. Wall Street immediately signaled the deal was likely now a long shot, with shares in the companies falling sharply.

Justice Department officials warned that allowing AT&T to gobble up the No. 4 carrier would be disastrous for consumers.

“Were the merger to proceed, there would only be three providers with 90 percent of the market, and competition among the remaining competitors on all dimensions, including price, quality and innovation, would be diminished,” Deputy Attorney General James Cole said.

The lawsuit came only five months after the deal was announced and despite the surprising timing, one source close to the case said it was a real attempt to halt a “fundamentally flawed” deal, not a tactic to wring big concessions from AT&T.

They would have to give up “so much” to win approval, the source said. Still, Justice Department officials said they were willing to consider proposals to ameliorate their concerns, but they expected to the fight to shift to federal court.

A source close to one of the carriers said they may have to offer to divest up to 25 percent of the combined company’s assets, up from an earlier estimate of up to 10 percent, to try to save the deal.

The government’s lawsuit overshadowed an announcement just hours earlier by AT&T that it would bring back 5,000 call center jobs to the US if the deal closed.

Just a day ago, the two sides had met to continue discussions on the merger and the Justice Department dropped no hints that it was getting frustrated with the talks.

The two sides were “talking past each other,” said one source familiar with the case, adding that the Justice Department side felt that nothing was really presented to address their competition concerns.

AT&T’s Stephenson has argued that his company needs T-Mobile to get more wireless airwaves to meet exploding demand for high-speed mobile services from smartphones and tablets.

Stephenson put himself on the line with this deal so he has no choice but to double down, said a person close to AT&T.

Shares of AT&T closed down 3.8 percent at US$28.48 on the New York Stock Exchange, while Deutsche Telekom shares fell 7.6 percent to 8.81 euros in Frankfurt trade.

“This one took everybody by surprise,” said a person close to one of the carriers, adding that they thought the Justice Department would ask for concessions but not derail the deal.

Meanwhile shares of Sprint Nextel Corp — the No. 3 US wireless carrier, which has fiercely opposed the deal — shot up almost 6 percent to close at US$3.76. A scuppered acquisition could prompt Sprint to consider buying T-Mobile.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top