The saga of Steven Jobs is so well known that it has entered the US’ mythology: He’s the prodigal who returned to Apple in 1997, righted a listing ship and built it into one of the most valuable companies in the world.
But the Jobs of the mid-1980s probably never could have made Apple what it is today if he hadn’t embarked on a torment-filled business odyssey.
Lawrence Ellison, the chief executive of Oracle, overlooks this. In August, after the ouster of Mark Hurd as the chief executive of Hewlett-Packard, Ellison said in an e-mail to the NY Times that the HP board had made “the worst personnel decision since the idiots on the Apple board fired Steve Jobs many years ago.”
Actually, the Apple co-founder wasn’t fired. Jobs was relieved of operating responsibilities in a company reorganization in May 1985, but he was still the company’s chairman. Apple was ailing: Sales of the Macintosh were falling well below expectations; inventory was piling up; and the company seemed headed for its first-ever loss. In September 1985, Jobs resigned to start a new computer company he called NeXT.
Suppose Jobs had not left in 1985. Suppose he had convinced the Apple board to oust his nemesis, John Sculley, then chief executive and president. Under Jobs’ uninterrupted direction, would Apple have arrived at the pinnacle it has reached today, but 12 years earlier?
It’s hard to see how anything like that would have transpired. The Steve Jobs who returned to Apple was a much more capable leader — precisely because he had been badly banged up.
“I am convinced that he would not have been as successful after his return at Apple if he hadn’t gone through his wilderness experience at NeXT,” said Tim Bajarin, president of Creative Strategies, a technology consulting company.
Jobs began NeXT, with the intention of building a high-powered computer expressly for customers in higher education, giving students and scholars what he called “a personal mainframe.”
Advisers from universities told him that he should keep the price under US$2,000, but the price of the NeXT machine when finally unveiled in 1988 was US$6,500. When colleges and universities, not surprisingly, demurred, Jobs tried to sell to corporate customers by enlisting Businessland, then a big computer retailer, but fared no better in that market.
Jobs’ lieutenants tried to warn him away from certain disaster, but he was not receptive. In 1992 to 93, seven of nine Next vice presidents were shown the door or left on their own.
In this period, Jobs did not do much delegating. Almost every aspect of the machine — including the finish on interior screws — was his domain. The interior furnishings of Next’s offices, a stunning design showplace, were Jobs’ concern, too.
Next’s computer hardware and software were filled with innovations that drew a small, but devoted, following. Jobs had created the first easy-to-use Unix machine, but the mainstream marketplace shrugged. He had already helped bring to market an easy-to-use machine, the Mac, so the Next couldn’t differentiate itself enough — and certainly not at the price the company charged.
After selling only 50,000 computers in seven years, he finally pulled the plug on manufacturing hardware, laid off more than half his 500 employees and tried to make a go of selling Next’s software. His company would end up serving as Apple’s R&D laboratory. Apple acquired the company in 1997 and used Next’s software as the basis for the new operating system, Mac OS X.
Jobs had to get out of his system the idea that computing in the future would resemble computing in the past. In recent years, with the iPod, the iPhone and the iPad, he has worked on computing that does not take place in conventionally shaped computer boxes. He didn’t invent the media player, the smart phone or the tablet, but he understood that no one else had yet come up with the equivalent of a Mac. So these offered ripe opportunities for him to bring his design talents to bear.
And he had always been able to attract great talent. What he hadn’t learned before returning to Apple, however, was the necessity of retaining it. He has now done so. One of the unremarked aspects of Apple’s recent story is the stability of the executive team.
Jobs had learned from Next not to try to do everything himself, said Kevin Compton, who was a senior executive at Businessland during the NeXT years.
It took 12 years, much bruising and perspective gained from exile. If he had instead stayed at Apple, the transformation of Apple Computer into today’s far larger Apple Inc might never have happened.
Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University.
WASHINGTON’S INCENTIVES: The CHIPS Act set aside US$39 billion in direct grants to persuade the world’s top semiconductor companies to make chips on US soil The US plans to award more than US$6 billion to Samsung Electronics Co, helping the chipmaker expand beyond a project in Texas it has already announced, people familiar with the matter said. The money from the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act would be one of several major awards that the US Department of Commerce is expected to announce in the coming weeks, including a grant of more than US$5 billion to Samsung’s rival, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), people familiar with the plans said. The people spoke on condition of anonymity in advance of the official announcements. The federal funding for
HIGH DEMAND: The firm has strong capabilities of providing key components including liquid cooling technology needed for AI servers, chairman Young Liu said Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) yesterday revised its revenue outlook for this year to “significant” growth from a “neutral” view forecast five months ago, due to strong demand for artificial intelligence (AI) servers from cloud service providers. Hon Hai, a major assembler of iPhones that is also known as Foxconn, expects AI server revenues to soar more than 40 percent annually this year, chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) told investors. The robust growth would uplift revenue contribution from AI servers to 40 percent of the company’s overall server revenue this year, from 30 percent last year, Liu said. In the three-year period
LONG HAUL: Largan Energy Materials’ TNO-based lithium-ion batteries are expected to charge in five minutes and last about 20 years, far surpassing conventional technology Largan Precision Co (大立光) has formed a joint venture with the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI, 工研院) to produce fast-charging, long-life lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles, mobile electronics and electric storage units, the camera lens supplier for Apple Inc’s iPhones said yesterday. Largan Energy Materials Co (萬溢能源材料), established in January, is developing high-energy, fast-charging, long-life lithium-ion batteries using titanium niobium oxide (TNO) anodes, it said. TNO-based batteries can be fully charged in five minutes and have a lifespan of 20 years, a major advantage over the two to four hours of charging time needed for conventional graphite-anode-based batteries, Largan said in a
Taiwan is one of the first countries to benefit from the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, but because that is largely down to a single company it also represents a risk, former Google Taiwan managing director Chien Lee-feng (簡立峰) said at an AI forum in Taipei yesterday. Speaking at the forum on how generative AI can generate possibilities for all walks of life, Chien said Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) — currently among the world’s 10 most-valuable companies due to continued optimism about AI — ensures Taiwan is one of the economies to benefit most from AI. “This is because AI is