The saga of Steven Jobs is so well known that it has entered the US’ mythology: He’s the prodigal who returned to Apple in 1997, righted a listing ship and built it into one of the most valuable companies in the world.
But the Jobs of the mid-1980s probably never could have made Apple what it is today if he hadn’t embarked on a torment-filled business odyssey.
Lawrence Ellison, the chief executive of Oracle, overlooks this. In August, after the ouster of Mark Hurd as the chief executive of Hewlett-Packard, Ellison said in an e-mail to the NY Times that the HP board had made “the worst personnel decision since the idiots on the Apple board fired Steve Jobs many years ago.”
Actually, the Apple co-founder wasn’t fired. Jobs was relieved of operating responsibilities in a company reorganization in May 1985, but he was still the company’s chairman. Apple was ailing: Sales of the Macintosh were falling well below expectations; inventory was piling up; and the company seemed headed for its first-ever loss. In September 1985, Jobs resigned to start a new computer company he called NeXT.
Suppose Jobs had not left in 1985. Suppose he had convinced the Apple board to oust his nemesis, John Sculley, then chief executive and president. Under Jobs’ uninterrupted direction, would Apple have arrived at the pinnacle it has reached today, but 12 years earlier?
It’s hard to see how anything like that would have transpired. The Steve Jobs who returned to Apple was a much more capable leader — precisely because he had been badly banged up.
“I am convinced that he would not have been as successful after his return at Apple if he hadn’t gone through his wilderness experience at NeXT,” said Tim Bajarin, president of Creative Strategies, a technology consulting company.
Jobs began NeXT, with the intention of building a high-powered computer expressly for customers in higher education, giving students and scholars what he called “a personal mainframe.”
Advisers from universities told him that he should keep the price under US$2,000, but the price of the NeXT machine when finally unveiled in 1988 was US$6,500. When colleges and universities, not surprisingly, demurred, Jobs tried to sell to corporate customers by enlisting Businessland, then a big computer retailer, but fared no better in that market.
Jobs’ lieutenants tried to warn him away from certain disaster, but he was not receptive. In 1992 to 93, seven of nine Next vice presidents were shown the door or left on their own.
In this period, Jobs did not do much delegating. Almost every aspect of the machine — including the finish on interior screws — was his domain. The interior furnishings of Next’s offices, a stunning design showplace, were Jobs’ concern, too.
Next’s computer hardware and software were filled with innovations that drew a small, but devoted, following. Jobs had created the first easy-to-use Unix machine, but the mainstream marketplace shrugged. He had already helped bring to market an easy-to-use machine, the Mac, so the Next couldn’t differentiate itself enough — and certainly not at the price the company charged.
After selling only 50,000 computers in seven years, he finally pulled the plug on manufacturing hardware, laid off more than half his 500 employees and tried to make a go of selling Next’s software. His company would end up serving as Apple’s R&D laboratory. Apple acquired the company in 1997 and used Next’s software as the basis for the new operating system, Mac OS X.
Jobs had to get out of his system the idea that computing in the future would resemble computing in the past. In recent years, with the iPod, the iPhone and the iPad, he has worked on computing that does not take place in conventionally shaped computer boxes. He didn’t invent the media player, the smart phone or the tablet, but he understood that no one else had yet come up with the equivalent of a Mac. So these offered ripe opportunities for him to bring his design talents to bear.
And he had always been able to attract great talent. What he hadn’t learned before returning to Apple, however, was the necessity of retaining it. He has now done so. One of the unremarked aspects of Apple’s recent story is the stability of the executive team.
Jobs had learned from Next not to try to do everything himself, said Kevin Compton, who was a senior executive at Businessland during the NeXT years.
It took 12 years, much bruising and perspective gained from exile. If he had instead stayed at Apple, the transformation of Apple Computer into today’s far larger Apple Inc might never have happened.
Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University.
DECOUPLING? In a sign of deeper US-China technology decoupling, Apple has held initial talks about using Baidu’s generative AI technology in its iPhones, the Wall Street Journal said China has introduced guidelines to phase out US microprocessors from Intel Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) from government PCs and servers, the Financial Times reported yesterday. The procurement guidance also seeks to sideline Microsoft Corp’s Windows operating system and foreign-made database software in favor of domestic options, the report said. Chinese officials have begun following the guidelines, which were unveiled in December last year, the report said. They order government agencies above the township level to include criteria requiring “safe and reliable” processors and operating systems when making purchases, the newspaper said. The US has been aiming to boost domestic semiconductor
Nvidia Corp earned its US$2.2 trillion market cap by producing artificial intelligence (AI) chips that have become the lifeblood powering the new era of generative AI developers from start-ups to Microsoft Corp, OpenAI and Google parent Alphabet Inc. Almost as important to its hardware is the company’s nearly 20 years’ worth of computer code, which helps make competition with the company nearly impossible. More than 4 million global developers rely on Nvidia’s CUDA software platform to build AI and other apps. Now a coalition of tech companies that includes Qualcomm Inc, Google and Intel Corp plans to loosen Nvidia’s chokehold by going
ENERGY IMPACT: The electricity rate hike is expected to add about NT$4 billion to TSMC’s electricity bill a year and cut its annual earnings per share by about NT$0.154 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) has left its long-term gross margin target unchanged despite the government deciding on Friday to raise electricity rates. One of the heaviest power consuming manufacturers in Taiwan, TSMC said it always respects the government’s energy policy and would continue to operate its fabs by making efforts in energy conservation. The chipmaker said it has left a long-term goal of more than 53 percent in gross margin unchanged. The Ministry of Economic Affairs concluded a power rate evaluation meeting on Friday, announcing electricity tariffs would go up by 11 percent on average to about NT$3.4518 per kilowatt-hour (kWh)
OPENING ADDRESS: The CEO is to give a speech on the future of high-performance computing and artificial intelligence at the trade show’s opening on June 3, TAITRA said Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) chairperson and chief executive officer Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) is to deliver the opening keynote speech at Computex Taipei this year, the event’s organizer said in a statement yesterday. Su is to give a speech on the future of high-performance computing (HPC) in the artificial intelligence (AI) era to open Computex, one of the world’s largest computer and technology trade events, at 9:30am on June 3, the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) said. Su is to explore how AMD and the company’s strategic technology partners are pushing the limits of AI and HPC, from data centers to