Microsoft Corp finally dangled a higher takeover bid in front of Yahoo Inc on Friday, hoping to reach a friendly deal after weeks of saber rattling.
The Redmond, Washington-based software maker upped its offer beyond the original value of US$44.6 billion, or US$31 per share, a person familiar with the matter said.
The specifics of the new offer weren’t known by the person, who didn’t want to be identified because the negotiations are still confidential.
The New York Times, citing unnamed sources, reported that Microsoft boosted the offer “by several dollars” per share, lending weight to the assertion by many market analysts that Microsoft can afford to pay up to US$35 a share.
Representatives from Microsoft and Yahoo declined to comment on the negotiations.
The talks were expected to continue into the weekend.
In an intriguing twist, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates and Yahoo President Susan Decker were both expected to be in Omaha, Nebraska, this weekend to attend Berkshire Hathaway Inc’s annual meeting.
Both Gates and Decker are on the board of the company led by famed investor Warren Buffett.
The prospect of a sweetened offer from Microsoft lifted Yahoo shares US$0.80 in extended trading after surging US$1.86, or nearly 7 percent, to finish the regular session at US$28.67.
Sunnyvale-based Yahoo began pressing for a higher offer shortly after Microsoft made its unsolicited bid in February. That offer, which was made half in cash and half in stock, is currently valued at US$42.3 billion, or US$29.40 per share, reflecting the decline in Microsoft shares since it began its pursuit of the Internet pioneer.
Most analysts have predicted all along that Microsoft eventually would buy Yahoo for US$32 to US$35 per share, so the news of Friday’s negotiations wasn’t a major surprise.
“It’s all going according to script,” said Ken Marlin, a New York investment banker specializing in technology deals.
The outcome of the weekend talks will likely ripple across the Internet.
If Microsoft and Yahoo shake hands on a deal, it will mark a significant step toward uniting two high-tech powerhouses whose online services are used by more than 500 million people worldwide.
An amicable transaction also would make it easier to meld the two companies’ disparate technologies and cultures.
Should the two sides remain at loggerheads, Microsoft could still try to force a sale by trying to replace Yahoo’s board with 10 directors more inclined to approve a deal.
But that risky maneuver, known as a proxy contest, would likely entail several months of mudslinging with no guarantee of success.
Even if Microsoft were to prevail in a hostile takeover, it could wind up with buyer’s remorse because the hard feelings provoked by the battle would drive off many of the Yahoo employees needed to make the deal pay off, said Arthur Dudley, a New York lawyer specializing in mergers and acquisitions.
“The trick for Microsoft is to figure out where the tipping point is,” Dudley said. “They probably don’t want to do a hostile takeover and just wind up with some more computer software and a bunch of empty desks.”
Yahoo executives think the company is well positioned to bounce back from its recent malaise, but Dudley doubts the company’s board will resist Microsoft if its new offer is sweet enough.
“Yahoo’s board won’t have a lot of choice if the price is right,” Dudley said.
“Now, everyone is just scratching their heads trying to figure out what the number is,” he said.
The government’s business climate monitor last month remained “green” thanks to more working days, but consumer confidence retreated this month as the COVID-19 pandemic escalated, the National Development Council said yesterday. The healthy readings had much to do with the timing of the Lunar New Year, but still reflected the fast-evolving economic effects of the pandemic, NDC research director Wu Ming-huei (吳明蕙) told a media briefing in Taipei. “There is no room for optimism as the virus spreads quickly in Europe and the US, where self-isolation requirements are freezing demand for nonessential products and services,” Wu said. The development is worrying and much
Facebook Inc on Tuesday said that the COVID-19 outbreak was undercutting sales of the advertising that accounts for nearly all of its revenue, even as more users spend time on the social network during virus-related lockdowns. “We don’t monetize many of the services where we’re seeing increased engagement, and we’ve seen a weakening in our ads business in countries taking aggressive actions to reduce the spread of COVID-19,” the company said in a statement. Facebook shares fell about 1 percent after hours following an 8.7 percent rise in regular trade. The company said messaging across its platforms had increased more than 50 percent
The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) yesterday said it would consider easing regulations on life insurers’ real-estate investments to allow them to cut rents for tenants affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The commission might lower the minimum rate of return on insurers’ real-estate investments, which stands at 2.095 percent, FSC Chairman Wellington Koo (顧立雄) told a meeting of the legislature’s Finance Committee. Koo’s comment came after the Life Insurance Association suggested the FSC trim the minimum rate of return so insurers could cut rents to help affected tenants, such as restaurants, hotels, travel agencies and department stores. While the association suggested a cut of
Fitch Ratings Inc reduced its outlook on eight Taiwanese securities companies from “stable” to “negative” to reflect heightened uncertainty in the operating environment amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The companies are Oriental Securities Corp (亞東證券), Concord Securities Co (康和證券), Grand Fortune Securities Co Ltd (福邦證券), Shin Kong International Securities Co (新光證券), Ta Ching Securities Co (大慶證券), Tachan Securities Co (大展證券), Horizon Securities Corp (宏遠證券) and CL Securities Taiwan Co Ltd (台灣匯立證券). The revision mirrored heightened uncertainty and increasing pressure on their earnings and profitability amid potential proprietary trading losses, Fitch said. Downside risks have built up from increased capital market volatility, as well as