Sun, May 08, 2005 - Page 11 News List

GE restates results, boosting earnings by US$381m

INTERNAL AUDIT General Electric said it had improperly accounted for financial instruments used to protect its financial services businesses from interest-rate hikes

AP , STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT

General Electric Co restated financial results for several years on Friday, boosting earnings by US$381 million from 2001 through the first quarter of this year.

While federal regulators are informally investigating accounting issues related to the restatement, GE said that its revision was sparked by an internal audit.

The diversified industrial, finance and media company also announced plans to sell a business that provides liability insurance for physicians and dentists to a unit of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc for US$825 million. It also boosted its earnings forecast for the second quarter, while reaffirming its full-year forecast.

GE shares closed unchanged at US$35.85 in Friday trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Its shares have traded in a range of US$29.55 to US$37.75 over the past year.

GE, based in Fairfield, said that during a regular audit staff review, it concluded that it had improperly accounted for financial instruments used to protect the company's financial services businesses from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates.

The company said the US$381 million non-cash restatement represents less than six-tenths of one percent of GE's earnings over this period. The restatement covers the years 2002 through last year, certain financial information for the year 2001 and each quarter in 2003 and last year.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), GE said that after it began work for an internal audit, the company received a letter dated Jan. 20, 2005 from the Boston District Office of the SEC, indicating that it was conducting an informal investigation and requesting that GE voluntarily provide documents and information with respect to the accounting practice in question.

GE said it intends to continue to cooperate fully with the SEC.

In a conference call, analysts asked if other areas of accounting were under scrutiny and whether more restatements were possible. GE officials noted that they had carefully reviewed the issue and filed the changes with regulators.

"We clearly wouldn't do all that if we really didn't think we've got it behind us," GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt said. "We really believe strongly that we've got full risk transfer, appropriate accounting and great disclosure."

Keith Sherin, senior vice president and CFO, said in a release, "Looking back, the result of not using hedge accounting is immaterial on an annual basis. However, on a quarterly basis the impacts would be material and we decided to restate results. There is no effect economically as the company's match funding objectives were met, and there has been no effect on cash flows."

Due to the restatement, first-quarter earnings are reduced by US$78 million, or US$0.01 per share, resulting in earnings per share of US$0.37.

Lawrence Horan, research director with Parker/Hunter in Pittsburgh, said he was not worried about the restatement and was encouraged by the earnings outlook.

"Accounting has become a nightmare," Horan said. "It's immaterial. This was a mistake in judgment."

The rule in question, known as Statement 133, is highly complex, said Ed Ketz, an associate professor of accounting at Pennsylvania State University. Several other companies have also restated their financial results in recent years because of the rule, including Allied Defense Group Inc, America West Holdings Corp, mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and New Brunswick Scientific Co, Ketz said.

This story has been viewed 3175 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top