Wed, May 10, 2000 - Page 17 News List

New MOEA head cools on selloff

POLICY Lin-Hsin-yi conceded that selling off state-run companies was not necessary to boost competitiveness but merely a means to an end. Labor unions agreed

By Richard Dobson  /  STAFF REPORTER

Economics Minister-designate Lin Hsin-yi (林信義) yesterday attempted to quell unease over job security among employees of state-run companies, saying that not every firm needs to be privatized and worker's rights would be paramount in formulating new policy on the matter.

"It is time to revise the policy of deregulation," said Lin, who was speaking at a parliamentary hearing organized by New Party (新黨) lawmakers Lai Shi-bao (賴士葆) and Hao Long-bin (郝龍斌). Also invited were union representatives from state-run firms such as Chinese Petroleum Corporation (中油), Taiwan Power (TaiPower, 台電) and China Steel Corporation (中鋼).

"Privatization is only a means to an end. The goal of privatizing state-run firms is to commercialize them and improve their competitiveness," Lin said.

Lin said that some state-owned companies which have commercialized well need not be privatized at all. "There is no need to privatize firms just for the sake of privatization," Lin said.

"Look at the performance of China Steel. With it doing so well, is there any need to deregulate it further?" he said.

Although China Steel was privatized in 1995, the government still holds a more than 40 percent stake in the firm. Late last year, company executives predicted that profits would rise by 19 percent in 2000.

Emphasizing the profitability of state-run firms, Lin said that assets of the twelve state-run companies total between NT$200 billion and NT$380 billion, while annual income for this year is expected to hit NT$700 billion, he said.

However, among these companies are utilities like TaiPower and the Chinese Petroleum Corporation, so these earnings are "expected," Lin said.

But, deregulation received a lashing from one union representative who said that privatization did not spell profit.

"Privatized China Steel may have done well, but the Chinese Petroleum Development Corporation has racked up losses since being privatized," said Lu Tian-lin a representative of the union for state-owned Aerospace Industrial Development Corporation (漢翔航空工業發展公司).

"But state-run companies turning profits include Chinese Petroleum Corporation, Chunghwa Telecom (中華電信) and Taipower," Lu said.

Lu also took issue over the government's method of deregulation, saying that instead of just selling stock and paring assets through open tender, firms could be deregulated by first commercializing them, then privatizating them.

He also advised that as different firms had different problems with deregulation, regulations should be "loosened and every firm dealt with on a case-by-case basis."

Lu found support in Sheng Wen-ching (鄭溫清), the vice chairman of the Ministry of Economic Affair's Commission of National Corporations (國營事業委員會), who said that deregulation policy should be revised to make it more "flexible" with the "rights of the workers foremost in mind."

Lin, keen to heal the rift over deregulation between the government and employees of state-run firms, promised that he would be "sincere in communicating" with the unions and "honest in handling the issue of worker's rights."

He also said that he would be willing to "sit down with union chiefs and discuss the concerns of the workers, whose interests must be guaranteed."

This story has been viewed 2515 times.
TOP top