For India, the worst possible fallout from US-led strikes on Afghanistan would be an Islamic fundamentalist takeover in Pakis-tan, placing nuclear weapons in radical hands.
This week, the heaviest firing in 10 months across the cease-fire line between the two countries was a reminder of the tension between the longtime foes, which both tested nuclear weapons three years ago.
It's believed that the Pakistani government has clear control over its nuclear wea-pons. But Indians worry that this could change because some members of Pakistan's military, and many of the country's Muslim militants, oppose the government's cooperation with US strikes in Afghanistan.
"There are reasons to be concerned if there were to be a coup d'etat or the military government were destabilized," said Shannon Kile, a researcher at the Stockholm Institute for Peace Research in Sweden. He said any change in who controls Pakistan's nuclear weapons could be dangerous.
Pakistan's president, General Pervez Musharraf, backs Washington's efforts to root out bin Laden, the chief suspect in the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the US, and undermine the Taliban rulers who shelter him in Afghanistan.
But thousands of Pakistanis, egged on by Muslim clerics, have surged into the streets to protest the US air strikes on Afghanistan, burning buildings and fighting with police.
Musharraf shuffled his top military brass this month to remove possible rivals. But that has done little to make Indians less edgy about whether the general, who seized power in a 1999 coup, could be overthrown himself by officers sympathetic to Afghanistan and bin Laden.
India and Pakistan have fought a total of three wars since their independence from Britain in 1947. Tensions often flare over India's accusations that Pakistan aids the Muslim militants fighting for the independence of India's Kashmir state or its merger with Pakistan.
On Monday, the Indian Army shelled Pakistani military posts across the cease-fire line in Kashmir, and a military statement said it was punishment for supporting the militants. Pakistan posts returned fire.
American diplomatic sources in Pakistan -- who spoke on condition of anonymity -- said they do not expect a hot war now between Pakistan and India, and most analysts think nuclear arms would not be available to play a role. The nuclear weapons of both countries are thought to be stored in un-assembled form in well-guarded locations.
Still, that has not quieted fears in India that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal could fall into the wrong hands.
Indian defense analyst Brahma Chellaney suggested the US should have a contingency plan for taking control of Pakistan's nuclear assets should the country start falling apart.
Kile of the Stockholm institute noted the US has a special team to seize nuclear weapons in unstable situations. He said a US mission took over half a ton of highly enriched uranium from poorly guarded sites in Kazakstan in 1994.
Indian analysts interpreted recent statements by Musharraf as warning his citizens of just such a scenario, implying Pakistan must either side with Washington or risk losing its nuclear weapons.
In a Sept. 25 speech, Musharraf mentioned the danger to Pakistan's "strategic nuclear and missile assets" when he warned that making a wrong decision about the US anti-terror campaign could lead to "unbearable losses."
RSS